Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Padmanaba Srinivasan
dblp:321/0640
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
offline reinforcement learning |
1.6 | 2 | 2025 | Behaviour Preference Regression for Offline Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2025 Offline Reinforcement Learning with Behavioral Supervisor Tuning · IJCAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › offline reinforcement learning
behavior regularization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Behaviour Preference Regression for Offline Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
value function estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Behaviour Preference Regression for Offline Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
q function maximization · 0.9paired comparison · 0.9behavioral cloning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Behaviour Preference Regression for Offline Reinforcement LearningabstractOffline reinforcement learning (RL) methods aim to learn optimal policies with access only to trajectories in a fixed dataset. Policy constraint methods formulate policy learning as an optimization problem that balances maximizing reward with minimizing deviation from the behavior policy. Closed form solutions to this problem can be derived as weighted behavioral cloning objectives that, in theory, must compute an intractable partition function. Reinforcement learning has gained popularity in language modeling to align models with human preferences; some recent works consider paired completions that are ranked by a preference model following which the likelihood of the preferred completion is directly increased. We adapt this approach of paired comparison. By reformulating the paired-sample optimization problem, we fit the maximum-mode of the Q function while maximizing behavioral consistency of policy actions. This yields our algorithm, Behavior Preference Regression for offline RL (BPR). We empirically evaluate BPR on the widely used D4RL Locomotion and Antmaze datasets, as well as the more challenging V-D4RL suite, which operates in image-based state spaces. BPR demonstrates state-of-the-art performance over all domains. Our on-policy experiments suggest that BPR takes advantage of the stability of on-policy value functions with minimal performance degradation on Locomotion datasets. Padmanaba Srinivasan, William J. Knottenbelt |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Offline Model-Based Reinforcement Learning with Anti-ExplorationabstractModel-based reinforcement learning (MBRL) algorithms learn a dynamics model from collected data and apply it to generate synthetic trajectories to enable faster learning. This is an especially promising paradigm in offline reinforcement learning (RL) where data may be limited in quantity, in addition to being deficient in coverage and quality. Practical approaches to offline MBRL usually rely on ensembles of dynamics models to prevent exploitation of any individual model and to extract uncertainty estimates that penalize values in states far from the dataset support. Uncertainty estimates from ensembles can vary greatly in scale, making it challenging to generalize hyperparameters well across even similar tasks. In this paper, we present Morse Model-based offline RL (MoMo), which extends the anti-exploration paradigm found in offline model-free RL to the model-based space. We develop model-free and model-based variants of MoMo and show how the model-free version can be extended to detect and deal with out-of-distribution (OOD) states using explicit uncertainty estimation without the need for large ensembles. MoMo performs offline MBRL using an anti-exploration bonus to counteract value overestimation in combination with a policy constraint, as well as a truncation function to terminate synthetic rollouts that are excessively OOD. Experimentally, we find that both model-free and model-based MoMo perform well, and the latter outperforms prior model-based and model-free baselines on the majority of D4RL datasets tested. Padmanaba Srinivasan, William J. Knottenbelt |
ECAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Offline Reinforcement Learning with Behavioral Supervisor Tuning
Padmanaba Srinivasan, William J. Knottenbelt |
IJCAI | 1 |