Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Anna Hakhverdyan
dblp:321/0928
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 50% Vision and language · 50% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Software maintenance and evolution · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language
neural module network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | NS3: Neuro-symbolic Semantic Code Search · NeurIPS 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | NS3: Neuro-symbolic Semantic Code Search · NeurIPS 2022 |
Software maintenance and evolution
code search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | NS3: Neuro-symbolic Semantic Code Search · NeurIPS 2022 |
Software maintenance and evolution › code search
semantic code search |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | NS3: Neuro-symbolic Semantic Code Search · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural module networks · 1.1neural embedding · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | NS3: Neuro-symbolic Semantic Code SearchabstractSemantic code search is the task of retrieving a code snippet given a textual description of its functionality. Recent work has been focused on using similarity metrics between neural embeddings of text and code. However, current language models are known to struggle with longer, compositional sentences, and multi-step reasoning. To overcome this limitation, we propose supplementing the query sentence with a layout of its semantic structure. The semantic layout is used to break down the final reasoning decision into a series of lower-level decisions. We use a Neural Module Network architecture to implement this idea. We compare our model - $NS^3$ (Neuro-Symbolic Semantic Search) - to a number of baselines, including state-of-the-art semantic code retrieval methods, such as CodeBERT, CuBERT and GraphCodeBERT, and evaluate on two datasets - Code Search Net (CSN) and Code Search and Question Answering (CoSQA). On these datasets, we demonstrate that our approach results in higher performance. We also perform additional studies to show the effectiveness of our modular design when handling compositional queries. Shushan Arakelyan, Anna Hakhverdyan, Miltiadis Allamanis, Luis Garcia 0001, Christophe Hauser |
NeurIPS | 2 |