Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William Shand

dblp:321/0940 · also Will Shand · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0001-6525-7091ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 67% Digital forensics and information hiding · 33%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Recommender systems · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Digital forensics and information hiding › digital forensics
data extraction
0.812024
Where Have You Been? A Study of Privacy Risk for Point-of-Interest Recommendation · KDD 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning
membership inference
0.812024
Where Have You Been? A Study of Privacy Risk for Point-of-Interest Recommendation · KDD 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning
privacy attack
0.812024
Where Have You Been? A Study of Privacy Risk for Point-of-Interest Recommendation · KDD 2024
Recommender systems
point-of-interest recommendation
0.212024
Where Have You Been? A Study of Privacy Risk for Point-of-Interest Recommendation · KDD 2024
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Where Have You Been? A Study of Privacy Risk for Point-of-Interest Recommendation
abstract
As location-based services (LBS) have grown in popularity, more human mobility data has been collected. The collected data can be used to build machine learning (ML) models for LBS to enhance their performance and improve overall experience for users. However, the convenience comes with the risk of privacy leakage since this type of data might contain sensitive information related to user identities, such as home/work locations. Prior work focuses on protecting mobility data privacy during transmission or prior to release, lacking the privacy risk evaluation of mobility data-based ML models. To better understand and quantify the privacy leakage in mobility data-based ML models, we design a privacy attack suite containing data extraction and membership inference attacks tailored for point-of-interest (POI) recommendation models, one of the most widely used mobility data-based ML models. These attacks in our attack suite assume different adversary knowledge and aim to extract different types of sensitive information from mobility data, providing a holistic privacy risk assessment for POI recommendation models. Our experimental evaluation using two real-world mobility datasets demonstrates that current POI recommendation models are vulnerable to our attacks. We also present unique findings to understand what types of mobility data are more susceptible to privacy attacks. Finally, we evaluate defenses against these attacks and highlight future directions and challenges.
Kunlin Cai, Jinghuai Zhang, Zhiqing Hong, William Shand, Guang Wang 0001, Desheng Zhang 0002, Jianfeng Chi, Yuan Tian 0001
KDD4