Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Paolo Muratore

dblp:321/1726 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0003-4520-5950ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 46% Representation and self-supervised learning · 30% Deep learning architectures and training · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Emerging computing paradigms · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning
hierarchical imitation learning
0.612022
Burst-Dependent Plasticity and Dendritic Amplification Support Target-Based Learning and Hierarchical Imitation Learning · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning
0.612022
Burst-Dependent Plasticity and Dendritic Amplification Support Target-Based Learning and Hierarchical Imitation Learning · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
representation similarity
0.612022
Prune and distill: similar reformatting of image information along rat visual cortex and deep neural networks · NeurIPS 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience
0.612022
Prune and distill: similar reformatting of image information along rat visual cortex and deep neural networks · NeurIPS 2022
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › visual cortex
visual cortex modeling
0.612022
Prune and distill: similar reformatting of image information along rat visual cortex and deep neural networks · NeurIPS 2022
Emerging computing paradigms
neuromorphic computing
0.612022
Burst-Dependent Plasticity and Dendritic Amplification Support Target-Based Learning and Hierarchical Imitation Learning · ICML 2022
Emerging computing paradigms › neuromorphic computing
spiking neural network
0.612022
Burst-Dependent Plasticity and Dendritic Amplification Support Target-Based Learning and Hierarchical Imitation Learning · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction › manifold learning
intrinsic dimension
0.212022
Prune and distill: similar reformatting of image information along rat visual cortex and deep neural networks · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

pruning · 1.1multi-compartment neuron model · 1.1distillation · 1.1dendritic amplification · 1.1burst-dependent plasticity · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Burst-Dependent Plasticity and Dendritic Amplification Support Target-Based Learning and Hierarchical Imitation Learning
abstract
The brain can learn to solve a wide range of tasks with high temporal and energetic efficiency. However, most biological models are composed of simple single-compartment neurons and cannot achieve the state-of-the-art performances of artificial intelligence. We propose a multi-compartment model of pyramidal neuron, in which bursts and dendritic input segregation give the possibility to plausibly support a biological target-based learning. In target-based learning, the internal solution of a problem (a spatio-temporal pattern of bursts in our case) is suggested to the network, bypassing the problems of error backpropagation and credit assignment. Finally, we show that this neuronal architecture naturally supports the orchestration of “hierarchical imitation learning”, enabling the decomposition of challenging long-horizon decision-making tasks into simpler subtasks.
Cristiano Capone, Cosimo Lupo, Paolo Muratore, Pier Stanislao Paolucci
ICML3
2022 Prune and distill: similar reformatting of image information along rat visual cortex and deep neural networks
abstract
Visual object recognition has been extensively studied in both neuroscience and computer vision. Recently, the most popular class of artificial systems for this task, deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs), has been shown to provide excellent models for its functional analogue in the brain, the ventral stream in visual cortex. This has prompted questions on what, if any, are the common principles underlying the reformatting of visual information as it flows through a CNN or the ventral stream. Here we consider some prominent statistical patterns that are known to exist in the internal representations of either CNNs or the visual cortex and look for them in the other system. We show that intrinsic dimensionality (ID) of object representations along the rat homologue of the ventral stream presents two distinct expansion-contraction phases, as previously shown for CNNs. Conversely, in CNNs, we show that training results in both distillation and active pruning (mirroring the increase in ID) of low- to middle-level image information in single units, as representations gain the ability to support invariant discrimination, in agreement with previous observations in rat visual cortex. Taken together, our findings suggest that CNNs and visual cortex share a similarly tight relationship between dimensionality expansion/reduction of object representations and reformatting of image information.
Paolo Muratore, Sina Tafazoli, Eugenio Piasini, Alessandro Laio, Davide Zoccolan
NeurIPS1
2022 Error-based or target-based? A unified framework for learning in recurrent spiking networks
abstract
The field of recurrent neural networks is over-populated by a variety of proposed learning rules and protocols. The scope of this work is to define a generalized framework, to move a step forward towards the unification of this fragmented scenario. In the field of supervised learning, two opposite approaches stand out, error-based and target-based. This duality gave rise to a scientific debate on which learning framework is the most likely to be implemented in biological networks of neurons. Moreover, the existence of spikes raises the question of whether the coding of information is rate-based or spike-based. To face these questions, we proposed a learning model with two main parameters, the rank of the feedback learning matrix [Formula: see text] and the tolerance to spike timing τ⋆. We demonstrate that a low (high) rank [Formula: see text] accounts for an error-based (target-based) learning rule, while high (low) tolerance to spike timing promotes rate-based (spike-based) coding. We show that in a store and recall task, high-ranks allow for lower MSE values, while low-ranks enable a faster convergence. Our framework naturally lends itself to Behavioral Cloning and allows for efficiently solving relevant closed-loop tasks, investigating what parameters [Formula: see text] are optimal to solve a specific task. We found that a high [Formula: see text] is essential for tasks that require retaining memory for a long time (Button and Food). On the other hand, this is not relevant for a motor task (the 2D Bipedal Walker). In this case, we find that precise spike-based coding enables optimal performances. Finally, we show that our theoretical formulation allows for defining protocols to estimate the rank of the feedback error in biological networks. We release a PyTorch implementation of our model supporting GPU parallelization.
Cristiano Capone, Paolo Muratore, Pier Stanislao Paolucci
PLoS Comput. Biol.2