EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ekaterina Borodich
dblp:321/3623
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
3 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 78% Computational complexity · 12% Graph algorithms and graph theory · 10% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithms for Non-Smooth Convex Decentralized Optimization over Time-Varying Networks · NeurIPS 2024 Optimal Gradient Sliding and its Application to Optimal Distributed Optimization Under Similarity · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
minimax optimization |
1.0 | 2 | 2025 | On Linear Convergence in Smooth Convex-Concave Bilinearly-Coupled Saddle-Point Optimization: Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithms · ICML 2025 Optimal Gradient Sliding and its Application to Optimal Distributed Optimization Under Similarity · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › minimax optimization
convex-concave optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On Linear Convergence in Smooth Convex-Concave Bilinearly-Coupled Saddle-Point Optimization: Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithms · ICML 2025 |
Computational complexity › complexity classes › approximation classes › optimization complexity
lower complexity bounds |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | On Linear Convergence in Smooth Convex-Concave Bilinearly-Coupled Saddle-Point Optimization: Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithms · ICML 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › distributed optimization
decentralized optimization |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithms for Non-Smooth Convex Decentralized Optimization over Time-Varying Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
temporal graph |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithms for Non-Smooth Convex Decentralized Optimization over Time-Varying Networks · NeurIPS 2024 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › first-order methods › gradient-based optimization
accelerated gradient methods |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Optimal Gradient Sliding and its Application to Optimal Distributed Optimization Under Similarity · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › stochastic optimization
communication-efficient distributed optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Optimal Gradient Sliding and its Application to Optimal Distributed Optimization Under Similarity · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization
distributed optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Optimal Gradient Sliding and its Application to Optimal Distributed Optimization Under Similarity · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization
variational inequality |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Optimal Gradient Sliding and its Application to Optimal Distributed Optimization Under Similarity · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
matrix-vector multiplication · 0.9gradient evaluation · 0.9subgradient computation · 0.8optimal algorithm design · 0.8lower bound analysis · 0.8inexact accelerated gradient · 0.6gradient sliding · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | On Linear Convergence in Smooth Convex-Concave Bilinearly-Coupled Saddle-Point Optimization: Lower Bounds and Optimal AlgorithmsabstractWe revisit the smooth convex-concave bilinearly-coupled saddle-point problem of the form $\min_x\max_y f(x) + ⟨y,\mathbf{B} x⟩- g(y)$. In the highly specific case where function $f(x)$ is strongly convex and function $g(y)$ is affine, or both functions are affine, there exist lower bounds on the number of gradient evaluations and matrix-vector multiplications required to solve the problem, as well as matching optimal algorithms. A notable aspect of these algorithms is that they are able to attain linear convergence, i.e., the number of iterations required to solve the problem is proportional to $\log(1/\epsilon)$. However, the class of bilinearly-coupled saddle-point problems for which linear convergence is possible is much wider and can involve general smooth non-strongly convex functions $f(x)$ and $g(y)$. Therefore, we develop the first lower complexity bounds and matching optimal linearly converging algorithms for this problem class. Our lower complexity bounds are much more general, but they cover and unify the existing results in the literature. On the other hand, our algorithm implements the separation of complexities, which, for the first time, enables the simultaneous achievement of both optimal gradient evaluation and matrix-vector multiplication complexities, resulting in the best theoretical performance to date. Ekaterina Borodich, Alexander V. Gasnikov, Dmitry Kovalev |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithms for Non-Smooth Convex Decentralized Optimization over Time-Varying NetworksabstractWe consider the task of minimizing the sum of convex functions stored in a decentralized manner across the nodes of a communication network. This problem is relatively well-studied in the scenario when the objective functions are smooth, or the links of the network are fixed in time, or both. In particular, lower bounds on the number of decentralized communications and (sub)gradient computations required to solve the problem have been established, along with matching optimal algorithms. However, the remaining and most challenging setting of non-smooth decentralized optimization over time-varying networks is largely underexplored, as neither lower bounds nor optimal algorithms are known in the literature. We resolve this fundamental gap with the following contributions: (i) we establish the first lower bounds on the communication and subgradient computation complexities of solving non-smooth convex decentralized optimization problems over time-varying networks; (ii) we develop the first optimal algorithm that matches these lower bounds and offers substantially improved theoretical performance compared to the existing state of the art. Dmitry Kovalev, Ekaterina Borodich, Alexander V. Gasnikov, Dmitrii Feoktistov |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2022 | Optimal Gradient Sliding and its Application to Optimal Distributed Optimization Under SimilarityabstractWe study structured convex optimization problems, with additive objective $r:=p + q$, where $r$ is ($\mu$-strongly) convex, $q$ is $L_q$-smooth and convex, and $p$ is $L_p$-smooth, possibly nonconvex. For such a class of problems, we proposed an inexact accelerated gradient sliding method that can skip the gradient computation for one of these components while still achieving optimal complexity of gradient calls of $p$ and $q$, that is, $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{L_p/\mu})$ and $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{L_q/\mu})$, respectively. This result is much sharper than the classic black-box complexity $\mathcal{O}(\sqrt{(L_p+L_q)/\mu})$, especially when the difference between $L_p$ and $L_q$ is large. We then apply the proposed method to solve distributed optimization problems over master-worker architectures, under agents' function similarity, due to statistical data similarity or otherwise. The distributed algorithm achieves for the first time lower complexity bounds on both communication and local gradient calls, with the former having being a long-standing open problem. Finally the method is extended to distributed saddle-problems (under function similarity) by means of solving a class of variational inequalities, achieving lower communication and computation complexity bounds. Dmitry Kovalev, Aleksandr Beznosikov, Ekaterina Borodich, Alexander V. Gasnikov, Gesualdo Scutari |
NeurIPS | 3 |