EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Emmanouil Sylligardos
dblp:321/6186
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5539-3209ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Interpretable Multivariate Anomaly Detector Selection for Automatic Marine Data Quality ControlabstractInternational audience Ngoc-Thanh Nguyen 0002, Astrid Marie Skålvik, Emmanouil Sylligardos, Rogardt Heldal, Patrizio Pelliccione, Paul Boniol, Themis Palpanas, Sverre Jakob Alvsvåg |
IEEE Big Data | 3 |
| 2025 | MSAD: A deep dive into model selection for time series anomaly detection
Emmanouil Sylligardos, John Paparrizos, Themis Palpanas, Pierre Senellart, Paul Boniol |
VLDB J. | 1 |
| 2024 | ADecimo: Model Selection for Time Series Anomaly DetectionabstractAnomaly detection is a fundamental task for time-series analytics with important implications for the downstream performance of many applications. Despite increasing academic interest and the large number of methods proposed in the literature, recent benchmark and evaluation studies demonstrated that there exists no single best anomaly detection method when applied to heterogeneous time series datasets. Therefore, the only scalable and viable solution to solve anomaly detection over very different time series collected from diverse domains is to propose a model selection method that will choose, based on time series characteristics, the best anomaly detection method to run. This paper describes ADecimo, a modular and extensible web application that helps users understand the performance of time series classification algorithms used as model selection methods for time series anomaly detection. Overall, our system enables users to compare 17 different classifiers over 1980 time series, and decide on the most suitable time series classification method for their own time series and use cases. Paul Boniol, Emmanouil Sylligardos, John Paparrizos, Panos E. Trahanias, Themis Palpanas |
ICDE | 2 |
| 2023 | Choose Wisely: An Extensive Evaluation of Model Selection for Anomaly Detection in Time SeriesabstractAnomaly detection is a fundamental task for time-series analytics with important implications for the downstream performance of many applications. Despite increasing academic interest and the large number of methods proposed in the literature, recent benchmark and evaluation studies demonstrated that no overall best anomaly detection methods exist when applied to very heterogeneous time series datasets. Therefore, the only scalable and viable solution to solve anomaly detection over very different time series collected from diverse domains is to propose a model selection method that will select, based on time series characteristics, the best anomaly detection method to run. Existing AutoML solutions are, unfortunately, not directly applicable to time series anomaly detection, and no evaluation of time series-based approaches for model selection exists. Towards that direction, this paper studies the performance of time series classification methods used as model selection for anomaly detection. Overall, we compare 17 different classifiers over 1800 time series, and we propose the first extensive experimental evaluation of time series classification as model selection for anomaly detection. Our results demonstrate that model selection methods outperform every single anomaly detection method while being in the same order of magnitude regarding execution time. This evaluation is the first step to demonstrate the accuracy and efficiency of time series classification algorithms for anomaly detection, and represents a strong baseline that can then be used to guide the model selection step in general AutoML pipelines. Emmanouil Sylligardos, Paul Boniol, John Paparrizos, Panos E. Trahanias, Themis Palpanas |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |