Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yijun Liang

dblp:321/7076 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Generative modeling · 19% Learning paradigms · 19% Vision and language · 19%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
curriculum learning
0.912025
Diffusion Curriculum: Synthetic-to-Real Data Curriculum via Image-Guided Diffusion · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Diffusion Curriculum: Synthetic-to-Real Data Curriculum via Image-Guided Diffusion · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness evaluation
0.912025
ColorBench: Can VLMs See and Understand the Colorful World? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Color Perception, Reasoning, and Robustness · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.912025
ColorBench: Can VLMs See and Understand the Colorful World? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Color Perception, Reasoning, and Robustness · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning
0.612022
Compute Like Humans: Interpretable Step-by-step Symbolic Computation with Deep Neural Network · KDD 2022
Algorithms and data structures
symbolic computation
0.612022
Compute Like Humans: Interpretable Step-by-step Symbolic Computation with Deep Neural Network · KDD 2022
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
synthetic data
0.312025
Diffusion Curriculum: Synthetic-to-Real Data Curriculum via Image-Guided Diffusion · ICCV 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.212022
Compute Like Humans: Interpretable Step-by-step Symbolic Computation with Deep Neural Network · KDD 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

tree representation learning · 1.1transformer encoder · 1.1graph neural network · 1.1diffusion model · 0.9curriculum learning · 0.9chain-of-thought · 0.9benchmark evaluation · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Diffusion Curriculum: Synthetic-to-Real Data Curriculum via Image-Guided Diffusion
Yijun Liang, Shweta Bhardwaj, Tianyi Zhou 0001
ICCV1
2025 ColorBench: Can VLMs See and Understand the Colorful World? A Comprehensive Benchmark for Color Perception, Reasoning, and Robustness
abstract
Color plays an important role in human perception and usually provides critical clues in visual reasoning. However, it is unclear whether and how vision-language models (VLMs) can perceive, understand, and leverage color as humans.This paper introduces ColorBench, an innovative benchmark meticulously crafted to assess the capabilities of VLMs in color understanding, including color perception, reasoning, and robustness. By curating a suite of diverse test scenarios, with grounding in real applications, ColorBench evaluates how these models perceive colors, infer meanings from color-based cues, and maintain consistent performance under varying color transformations. Through an extensive evaluation of 32 VLMs with varying language models and vision encoders, our paper reveals some undiscovered findings: (i) The scaling law (larger models are better) still holds on ColorBench, while the language model plays a more important role than the vision encoder. (ii) However, the performance gaps across models are relatively small, indicating that color understanding has been largely neglected by existing VLMs. (iii) CoT reasoning improves color understanding accuracies and robustness, though they are vision-centric tasks. (iv) Color clues are indeed leveraged by VLMs on ColorBench but they can also mislead models in some tasks.These findings highlight the critical limitations of current VLMs and underscore the need to enhance color comprehension. Our ColorBench can serve as a foundational tool for advancing the study of human-level color understanding of multimodal AI.
Yijun Liang, Ming Li 0010, Chenrui Fan, Kwesi Cobbina, Shweta Bhardwaj, Jiuhai Chen, Fuxiao Liu, Tianyi Zhou 0001
NeurIPS1
2022 Compute Like Humans: Interpretable Step-by-step Symbolic Computation with Deep Neural Network
abstract
Neural network capability in symbolic computation has emerged in much recent work. However, symbolic computation is always treated as an end-to-end blackbox prediction task, where human-like symbolic deductive logic is missing. In this paper, we argue that any complex symbolic computation can be broken down to a sequence of finite Fundamental Computation Transformations (FCT), which are grounded as certain mathematical expression computation transformations. The entire computation sequence represents a full human understandable symbolic deduction process. Instead of studying on different end-to-end neural network applications, this paper focuses on approximating FCT which further build up symbolic deductive logic. To better mimic symbolic computations with math expression transformations, we propose a novel tree representation learning architecture GATE (Graph Aggregation Transformer Encoder) for math expressions. We generate a large-scale math expression transformation dataset for training purpose and collect a real-world dataset for validation. Experiments demonstrate the feasibility of producing step-by-step human-like symbolic deduction sequences with the proposed approach, which outperforms other neural network approaches and heuristic approaches.
Shuai Peng, Di Fu, Yijun Liang, Gu Xu, Liangcai Gao, Zhi Tang 0001
KDD4