Andrew Townsend

dblp:321/9924 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7002-2318ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 77% Image and video processing · 23%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics › volume visualization
multimodal volume visualization
0.912025
Bimodal Visualization of Industrial X-Ray and Neutron Computed Tomography Data · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025
Visualization and visual analytics
scientific visualization
0.912025
Bimodal Visualization of Industrial X-Ray and Neutron Computed Tomography Data · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025
Medical and health informatics › medical imaging › x-ray imaging
computed tomography
0.312025
Bimodal Visualization of Industrial X-Ray and Neutron Computed Tomography Data · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025
Image and video processing
image segmentation
0.312025
Bimodal Visualization of Industrial X-Ray and Neutron Computed Tomography Data · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025
Image and video processing › image segmentation
topological segmentation
0.312025
Bimodal Visualization of Industrial X-Ray and Neutron Computed Tomography Data · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

brushing interaction · 1.7bivariate histogram segmentation · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Bimodal Visualization of Industrial X-Ray and Neutron Computed Tomography Data
abstract
Advanced manufacturing creates increasingly complex objects with material compositions that are often difficult to characterize by a single modality. Our collaborating domain scientists are going beyond traditional methods by employing both X-ray and neutron computed tomography to obtain complementary representations expected to better resolve material boundaries. However, the use of two modalities creates its own challenges for visualization, requiring either complex adjustments of bimodal transfer functions or the need for multiple views. Together with experts in nondestructive evaluation, we designed a novel interactive bimodal visualization approach to create a combined view of the co-registered X-ray and neutron acquisitions of industrial objects. Using an automatic topological segmentation of the bivariate histogram of X-ray and neutron values as a starting point, the system provides a simple yet effective interface to easily create, explore, and adjust a bimodal visualization. We propose a widget with simple brushing interactions that enables the user to quickly correct the segmented histogram results. Our semiautomated system enables domain experts to intuitively explore large bimodal datasets without the need for either advanced segmentation algorithms or knowledge of visualization techniques. We demonstrate our approach using synthetic examples, industrial phantom objects created to stress bimodal scanning techniques, and real-world objects, and we discuss expert feedback.
Xuan Huang 0007, Haichao Miao, Hyojin Kim 0001, Andrew Townsend, Kyle Champley, Joseph W. Tringe, Valerio Pascucci, Peer-Timo Bremer
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.4
2022 Virtual Inspection of Additively Manufactured Parts
abstract
Advanced manufacturing techniques, such as additive manufacturing, enable the design of increasingly complex components for a wide range of industrial applications. However, this complexity makes qualification of the parts, determining whether a part is within some margin of error from the initial design, difficult. To inspect and qualify complex internal geometries that are not accessible with an external probe, parts are typically scanned with computed tomography (CT), and manually compared to the computer-aided design (CAD) model using visual inspections. Matching the CAD model to the 3D reconstructed object is challenging in a traditional desktop environment due to the lack of depth perception and 3D interaction. An additional challenge comes from the geometric complexity of CAD meshes and large-scale CT scans. We present a virtual reality (VR) system for manual qualification, providing a novel defect visualization method. First, we describe a semiautomatic CAD-to-Scan Registration approach in VR using a finite element mesh. Second, we introduce the Defect Box, which enables full-resolution inspection for massive scans and CAD-CT comparison of local defect regions. Finally, our system includes intuitive 3D Metrology methods that enable natural interactions for the measurement of features and defects in VR. We demonstrate our approach on both real and synthetic data and discuss feedback from four expert users in nondestructive qualification.
Pavol Klacansky, Haichao Miao, Attila Gyulassy, Andrew Townsend, Kyle Champley, Joseph W. Tringe, Valerio Pascucci, Peer-Timo Bremer
PacificVis4