Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dohoon Ryu
dblp:321/9926
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Generative modeling · 76% Motion planning and robot control · 24% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | Solving 3D Inverse Problems Using Pre-Trained 2D Diffusion Models · CVPR 2023 Improving Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems using Manifold Constraints · NeurIPS 2022 |
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot kinematics
constraint manifold |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Improving Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems using Manifold Constraints · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
inverse problem solving |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Improving Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems using Manifold Constraints · NeurIPS 2022 |
Medical and health informatics
medical image reconstruction |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Solving 3D Inverse Problems Using Pre-Trained 2D Diffusion Models · CVPR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model-based iterative reconstruction · 1.32d diffusion prior augmentation · 1.3projection-based measurement consistency · 0.6manifold constraint correction · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Solving 3D Inverse Problems Using Pre-Trained 2D Diffusion ModelsabstractDiffusion models have emerged as the new state-of-the-art generative model with high quality samples, with intriguing properties such as mode coverage and high flexibility. They have also been shown to be effective inverse problem solvers, acting as the prior of the distribution, while the information of the forward model can be granted at the sampling stage. Nonetheless, as the generative process remains in the same high dimensional (i.e. identical to data dimension) space, the models have not been extended to 3D inverse problems due to the extremely high memory and computational cost. In this paper, we combine the ideas from the conventional model-based iterative reconstruction with the modern diffusion models, which leads to a highly effective method for solving 3D medical image reconstruction tasks such as sparse-view tomography, limited angle tomography, compressed sensing MRI from pre-trained 2D diffusion models. In essence, we propose to augment the 2D diffusion prior with a model-based prior in the remaining direction at test time, such that one can achieve coherent reconstructions across all dimensions. Our method can be run in a single commodity GPU, and establishes the new state-of-the-art, showing that the proposed method can perform reconstructions of high fidelity and accuracy even in the most extreme cases (e.g. 2-view 3D tomography). We further reveal that the generalization capacity of the proposed method is surprisingly high, and can be used to reconstruct volumes that are entirely different from the training dataset. Code available: https://github.com/HJ-harry/DiffusionMBIR Hyungjin Chung, Dohoon Ryu, Michael T. McCann, Marc Louis Klasky, Jong Chul Ye |
CVPR | 2 |
| 2022 | Improving Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems using Manifold ConstraintsabstractRecently, diffusion models have been used to solve various inverse problems in an unsupervised manner with appropriate modifications to the sampling process. However, the current solvers, which recursively apply a reverse diffusion step followed by a projection-based measurement consistency step, often produce sub-optimal results. By studying the generative sampling path, here we show that current solvers throw the sample path off the data manifold, and hence the error accumulates. To address this, we propose an additional correction term inspired by the manifold constraint, which can be used synergistically with the previous solvers to make the iterations close to the manifold. The proposed manifold constraint is straightforward to implement within a few lines of code, yet boosts the performance by a surprisingly large margin. With extensive experiments, we show that our method is superior to the previous methods both theoretically and empirically, producing promising results in many applications such as image inpainting, colorization, and sparse-view computed tomography. Code available https://github.com/HJ-harry/MCG_diffusion Hyungjin Chung, Byeongsu Sim, Dohoon Ryu, Jong Chul Ye |
NeurIPS | 3 |