Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthew Y. R. Yang
dblp:322/0271
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 54% Generative modeling · 46% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Digital forensics and information hiding · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
meta-reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimizing Test-Time Compute via Meta Reinforcement Finetuning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › reinforcement learning for NLP
reinforcement fine-tuning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Optimizing Test-Time Compute via Meta Reinforcement Finetuning · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Disguised Copyright Infringement of Latent Diffusion Models · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
latent diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Disguised Copyright Infringement of Latent Diffusion Models · ICML 2024 |
Digital forensics and information hiding
copyright infringement |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Disguised Copyright Infringement of Latent Diffusion Models · ICML 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
visual auditing · 1.5disguise generation · 1.5information gain · 0.9dense reward bonus · 0.9cumulative regret · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Optimizing Test-Time Compute via Meta Reinforcement FinetuningabstractTraining models to efficiently use test-time compute is crucial for improving the reasoning performance of LLMs. While current methods mostly do so via fine-tuning on search traces or running RL against the 0/1 outcome reward, do these approaches efficiently utilize test-time compute? Would these approaches continue to scale as the budget improves? In this paper, we try to answer these questions. We formalize the problem of optimizing test-time compute as a meta reinforcement learning (RL) problem, which provides a principled perspective on spending test-time compute from the lens of exploration and exploitation. It also motivates the use of cumulative regret to measure the efficacy of test-time compute by viewing a long output stream as consisting of several episodes from the model. While current state-of-the-art models do not optimize regret, we show that regret can be minimized by running final 0/1 reward RL regularized by a dense reward bonus, given by the "information gain" from each subsequent block in the output stream. We prescribe an approach for quantifying information gain, which measures the utility of an intermediate segment of tokens towards improving accuracy of the final answer. We instantiate this idea to develop MRT, a new class of finetuning methods for optimizing test-time compute. Fine-tuning with MRT leads to substantial improvements in both performance and token efficiency on the AIME dataset. Yuxiao Qu, Matthew Y. R. Yang, Amrith Setlur, Lewis Tunstall, Edward Beeching, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Aviral Kumar |
ICML | 2 |
| 2024 | Disguised Copyright Infringement of Latent Diffusion ModelsabstractCopyright infringement may occur when a generative model produces samples substantially similar to some copyrighted data that it had access to during the training phase. The notion of access usually refers to including copyrighted samples directly in the training dataset, which one may inspect to identify an infringement. We argue that such visual auditing largely overlooks a concealed copyright infringement, where one constructs a disguise that looks drastically different from the copyrighted sample yet still induces the effect of training Latent Diffusion Models on it. Such disguises only require indirect access to the copyrighted material and cannot be visually distinguished, thus easily circumventing the current auditing tools. In this paper, we provide a better understanding of such disguised copyright infringement by uncovering the disguises generation algorithm, the revelation of the disguises, and importantly, how to detect them to augment the existing toolbox. Additionally, we introduce a broader notion of acknowledgment for comprehending such indirect access. Yiwei Lu 0001, Matthew Y. R. Yang, Zuoqiu Liu, Gautam Kamath 0001, Yaoliang Yu |
ICML | 2 |