EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Weicheng Dai
dblp:322/0534
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Segmentation and scene understanding · 38% Trustworthy machine learning · 23% Vision and language · 20% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Mine yOur owN Anatomy: Revisiting Medical Image Segmentation With Extremely Limited Labels · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 Rethinking Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation: A Variance-Reduction Perspective · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding
medical image segmentation |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Mine yOur owN Anatomy: Revisiting Medical Image Segmentation With Extremely Limited Labels · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 Rethinking Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation: A Variance-Reduction Perspective · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › medical image segmentation
semi-supervised segmentation |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Mine yOur owN Anatomy: Revisiting Medical Image Segmentation With Extremely Limited Labels · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024 Rethinking Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation: A Variance-Reduction Perspective · NeurIPS 2023 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › vision-language model adaptation
CLIP fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Calibrating Multi-modal Representations: A Pursuit of Group Robustness without Annotations · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
group robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Calibrating Multi-modal Representations: A Pursuit of Group Robustness without Annotations · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Calibrating Multi-modal Representations: A Pursuit of Group Robustness without Annotations · CVPR 2024 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model › vision-language model adaptation
vision-language model fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Calibrating Multi-modal Representations: A Pursuit of Group Robustness without Annotations · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › spurious correlation
spurious correlation mitigation |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Calibrating Multi-modal Representations: A Pursuit of Group Robustness without Annotations · CVPR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
contrastive learning · 2.2representation calibration · 0.8nearest neighbor · 0.8last-layer retraining · 0.8data augmentation · 0.8variance reduction · 0.7stratified group theory · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Calibrating Multi-modal Representations: A Pursuit of Group Robustness without AnnotationsabstractFine-tuning pre-trained vision-language models, like CLIP, has yielded success on diverse downstream tasks. However, several pain points persist for this paradigm: (i) directly tuning entire pre-trained models becomes both time-intensive and computationally costly. Additionally, these tuned models tend to become highly specialized, limiting their practicality for real-world deployment; (ii) recent studies indicate that pre-trained vision-language classifiers may overly depend on spurious features - patterns that correlate with the target in training data, but are not related to the true labeling function; and (iii) existing studies on mitigating the reliance on spurious features, largely based on the assumption that we can identify such features, does not provide definitive assurance for real-world applications. As a piloting study, this work focuses on exploring mitigating the reliance on spurious features for CLIP without using any group annotation. To this end, we systematically study the existence of spurious correlation on CLIP and CLIP+ERM. We first, following recent work on Deep Feature Reweighting (DFR), verify that last-layer retraining can greatly improve group robustness on pretrained CLIP. In view of them, we advocate a lightweight representation calibration method for fine-tuning CLIP, by first generating a calibration set using the pretrained CLIP, and then calibrating representations of samples within this set through contrastive learning, all without the need for group labels. Extensive experiments and in-depth visualizations on several benchmarks validate the effectiveness of our proposals, largely reducing reliance and significantly boosting the model generalization. Our codes will be available in here. Chenyu You, Yifei Min, Weicheng Dai, Jasjeet S. Sekhon, Lawrence H. Staib, James S. Duncan |
CVPR | 3 |
| 2024 | Mine yOur owN Anatomy: Revisiting Medical Image Segmentation With Extremely Limited LabelsabstractRecent studies on contrastive learning have achieved remarkable performance solely by leveraging few labels in the context of medical image segmentation. Existing methods mainly focus on instance discrimination and invariant mapping (i.e., pulling positive samples closer and negative samples apart in the feature space). However, they face three common pitfalls: (1) tailness: medical image data usually follows an implicit long-tail class distribution. Blindly leveraging all pixels in training hence can lead to the data imbalance issues, and cause deteriorated performance; (2) consistency: it remains unclear whether a segmentation model has learned meaningful and yet consistent anatomical features due to the intra-class variations between different anatomical features; and (3) diversity: the intra-slice correlations within the entire dataset have received significantly less attention. This motivates us to seek a principled approach for strategically making use of the dataset itself to discover similar yet distinct samples from different anatomical views. In this paper, we introduce a novel semi-supervised 2D medical image segmentation framework termed Mine yOur owNAnatomy (MONA), and make three contributions. First, prior work argues that every pixel equally matters to the model training; we observe empirically that this alone is unlikely to define meaningful anatomical features, mainly due to lacking the supervision signal. We show two simple solutions towards learning invariances-through the use of stronger data augmentations and nearest neighbors. Second, we construct a set of objectives that encourage the model to be capable of decomposing medical images into a collection of anatomical features in an unsupervised manner. Lastly, we both empirically and theoretically, demonstrate the efficacy of our MONA on three benchmark datasets with different labeled settings, achieving new state-of-the-art under different labeled semi-supervised settings. MONA makes minimal assumptions on domain expertise, and hence constitutes a practical and versatile solution in medical image analysis. We provide the PyTorch-like pseudo-code in supplementary. Chenyu You, Weicheng Dai, Yifei Min, Nicha C. Dvornek, Xiaoxiao Li 0001, David A. Clifton, Lawrence H. Staib, James S. Duncan |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2023 | Implicit Anatomical Rendering for Medical Image Segmentation with Stochastic Experts
Chenyu You, Weicheng Dai, Yifei Min, Lawrence H. Staib, James S. Duncan |
MICCAI (3) | 2 |
| 2023 | ACTION++: Improving Semi-supervised Medical Image Segmentation with Adaptive Anatomical Contrast
Chenyu You, Weicheng Dai, Yifei Min, Lawrence H. Staib, Jasjeet S. Sekhon, James S. Duncan |
MICCAI (4) | 2 |
| 2023 | Rethinking Semi-Supervised Medical Image Segmentation: A Variance-Reduction PerspectiveabstractFor medical image segmentation, contrastive learning is the dominant practice to improve the quality of visual representations by contrasting semantically similar and dissimilar pairs of samples. This is enabled by the observation that without accessing ground truth labels, negative examples with truly dissimilar anatomical features, if sampled, can significantly improve the performance. In reality, however, these samples may come from similar anatomical features and the models may struggle to distinguish the minority tail-class samples, making the tail classes more prone to misclassification, both of which typically lead to model collapse. In this paper, we propose $\texttt{ARCO}$, a semi-supervised contrastive learning (CL) framework with stratified group theory for medical image segmentation. In particular, we first propose building $\texttt{ARCO}$ through the concept of variance-reduced estimation, and show that certain variance-reduction techniques are particularly beneficial in pixel/voxel-level segmentation tasks with extremely limited labels. Furthermore, we theoretically prove these sampling techniques are universal in variance reduction. Finally, we experimentally validate our approaches on eight benchmarks, i.e., five 2D/3D medical and three semantic segmentation datasets, with different label settings, and our methods consistently outperform state-of-the-art semi-supervised methods. Additionally, we augment the CL frameworks with these sampling techniques and demonstrate significant gains over previous methods. We believe our work is an important step towards semi-supervised medical image segmentation by quantifying the limitation of current self-supervision objectives for accomplishing such challenging safety-critical tasks. Chenyu You, Weicheng Dai, Yifei Min, David A. Clifton, Shaohua Kevin Zhou, Lawrence H. Staib, James S. Duncan |
NeurIPS | 2 |