Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zeyang Zhuang
dblp:322/1112
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0006-7898-6895ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Systems and software security · 82% Web and mobile security · 18% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Software testing · 77% Programming languages and type systems · 23% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Graph data management · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Systems and software security › vulnerability discovery
fuzzing |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Don't Panic! Finding Bugs Hidden Behind Rust Runtime Safety Checks · CCS 2025 |
Systems and software security
memory safety |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Don't Panic! Finding Bugs Hidden Behind Rust Runtime Safety Checks · CCS 2025 |
Systems and software security
vulnerability discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Don't Panic! Finding Bugs Hidden Behind Rust Runtime Safety Checks · CCS 2025 |
Web and mobile security
javascript analysis |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Detecting and Understanding Self-Deleting JavaScript Code · WWW 2024 |
Graph data management
graph database |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Testing Graph Database Systems via Graph-Aware Metamorphic Relations · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Software testing
metamorphic testing |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Testing Graph Database Systems via Graph-Aware Metamorphic Relations · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Decoupled Self-supervised Learning for Graphs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Decoupled Self-supervised Learning for Graphs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph self-supervised learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Decoupled Self-supervised Learning for Graphs · NeurIPS 2022 |
Programming languages and type systems
rust |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Don't Panic! Finding Bugs Hidden Behind Rust Runtime Safety Checks · CCS 2025 |
Software testing › fault detection
logic bug detection |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Testing Graph Database Systems via Graph-Aware Metamorphic Relations · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fuzzing · 1.7query generation · 1.3graph-aware metamorphic relations · 1.3runtime monitoring · 0.8dynamic analysis · 0.8variational inference · 0.6latent variable modeling · 0.6evidence lower bound · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Don't Panic! Finding Bugs Hidden Behind Rust Runtime Safety ChecksabstractRust has been extensively used in software and system development due to its guarantees for memory and concurrency safety. Fuzzing is a popular bug detection technique for examining the correctness and robustness of programs. However, we identify that current state-of-the-art Rust fuzzers are significantly impeded by the ubiquitous presence of Rust runtime safety checks, resulting in poor effectiveness and efficiency. These checks, which are inserted either implicitly by the compiler or explicitly by the compiler or developers, could cause a high number of panic crashes and early program termination in fuzzing. Consequently, current fuzzers are unable to effectively explore deep code behind the runtime safety checks, leaving potential vulnerabilities undetected. Zeyang Zhuang, Zilun Wang, Wei Meng 0001, Michael R. Lyu |
CCS | 1 |
| 2024 | Detecting and Understanding Self-Deleting JavaScript CodeabstractSelf-deletion is a well-known strategy frequently utilized by malware to evade detection. Recently, this technique has found its way into client-side JavaScript code, significantly raising the complexity of JavaScript analysis. In this work, we systematically study the emerging client-side JavaScript self-deletion behavior on the web. We tackle various technical challenges associated with JavaScript dynamic analysis and introduce JSRay, a browser-based JavaScript runtime monitoring system designed to comprehensively study client-side script deletion. We conduct a large-scale measurement of one million popular websites, revealing that script self-deletion is prevalent in the real world. While our findings indicate that most developers employ self-deletion for legitimate purposes, we also discover that self-deletion has already been employed together with other anti-analysis techniques for cloaking suspicious operations in client-side JavaScript. Zeyang Zhuang, Wei Meng 0001, James Cheng |
WWW | 2 |
| 2023 | Testing Graph Database Systems via Graph-Aware Metamorphic RelationsabstractGraph database systems (GDBs) have supported many important real-world applications such as social networks, logistics, and path planning. Meanwhile, logic bugs are also prevalent in GDBs, leading to incorrect results and severe consequences. However, the logic bugs largely cannot be revealed by prior solutions which are unaware of the graph native structures of the graph data. In this paper, we propose Gamera (Graph-aware metamorphic relations), a novel metamorphic testing approach to uncover unknown logic bugs in GDBs. We design three classes of novel graph-aware Metamorphic Relations (MRs) based on the graph native structures. Gamera would generate a set of queries according to the graph-aware MRs to test diverse and complex GDB operations, and check whether the GDB query results conform to the chosen MRs. We thoroughly evaluated the effectiveness of Gamera on seven widely-used GDBs such as Neo4j and OrientDB. Gamera was highly effective in detecting logic bugs in GDBs. In total, it detected 39 logic bugs, of which 15 bugs have been confirmed, and three bugs have been fixed. Our experiments also demonstrated that Gamera significantly outperformed prior solutions including Grand, GD-smith and GDBMeter. Gamera has been well-recognized by GDB developers and we open-source our prototype implementation to contribute to the community. Zeyang Zhuang, Penghui Li 0001, Pingchuan Ma 0004, Wei Meng 0001, Shuai Wang 0011 |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2022 | Decoupled Self-supervised Learning for GraphsabstractThis paper studies the problem of conducting self-supervised learning for node representation learning on graphs. Most existing self-supervised learning methods assume the graph is homophilous, where linked nodes often belong to the same class or have similar features. However, such assumptions of homophily do not always hold in real-world graphs. We address this problem by developing a decoupled self-supervised learning (DSSL) framework for graph neural networks. DSSL imitates a generative process of nodes and links from latent variable modeling of the semantic structure, which decouples different underlying semantics between different neighborhoods into the self-supervised learning process. Our DSSL framework is agnostic to the encoders and does not need prefabricated augmentations, thus is flexible to different graphs. To effectively optimize the framework, we derive the evidence lower bound of the self-supervised objective and develop a scalable training algorithm with variational inference. We provide a theoretical analysis to justify that DSSL enjoys the better downstream performance. Extensive experiments on various types of graph benchmarks demonstrate that our proposed framework can achieve better performance compared with competitive baselines. Teng Xiao, Zhengyu Chen 0001, Zhimeng Guo, Zeyang Zhuang, Suhang Wang |
NeurIPS | 4 |