Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jack Brady

dblp:322/2181 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Representation and self-supervised learning · 57% Language models and text generation · 25% Generative modeling · 9%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
compositional generalization
1.622025
Interaction Asymmetry: A General Principle for Learning Composable Abstractions · ICLR 2025
Provable Compositional Generalization for Object-Centric Learning · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning
1.422025
Interaction Asymmetry: A General Principle for Learning Composable Abstractions · ICLR 2025
Embrace the Gap: VAEs Perform Independent Mechanism Analysis · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
object-centric representation learning
1.422024
Provable Compositional Generalization for Object-Centric Learning · ICLR 2024
Provably Learning Object-Centric Representations · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › causal representation learning
identifiability
0.822023
Embrace the Gap: VAEs Perform Independent Mechanism Analysis · NeurIPS 2022
Provably Learning Object-Centric Representations · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder
0.612022
Embrace the Gap: VAEs Perform Independent Mechanism Analysis · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation
identifiability theory
0.212024
Provable Compositional Generalization for Object-Centric Learning · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference › variational objective
evidence lower bound
0.212022
Embrace the Gap: VAEs Perform Independent Mechanism Analysis · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
variational inference
0.212022
Embrace the Gap: VAEs Perform Independent Mechanism Analysis · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

autoencoder · 1.6regularizer · 0.9Transformer-based VAE · 0.9identifiability theory · 0.8unsupervised learning · 0.7generative modeling · 0.7variational inference · 0.6self-consistency analysis · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Interaction Asymmetry: A General Principle for Learning Composable Abstractions
abstract
Learning disentangled representations of concepts and re-composing them in unseen ways is crucial for generalizing to out-of-domain situations. However, the underlying properties of concepts that enable such disentanglement and compositional generalization remain poorly understood. In this work, we propose the principle of interaction asymmetry which states: "Parts of the same concept have more complex interactions than parts of different concepts". We formalize this via block diagonality conditions on the $(n+1)$th order derivatives of the generator mapping concepts to observed data, where different orders of "complexity" correspond to different $n$. Using this formalism, we prove that interaction asymmetry enables both disentanglement and compositional generalization. Our results unify recent theoretical results for learning concepts of objects, which we show are recovered as special cases with $n=0$ or $1$. We provide results for up to $n=2$, thus extending these prior works to more flexible generator functions, and conjecture that the same proof strategies generalize to larger $n$. Practically, our theory suggests that, to disentangle concepts, an autoencoder should penalize its latent capacity and the interactions between concepts during decoding. We propose an implementation of these criteria using a flexible Transformer-based VAE, with a novel regularizer on the attention weights of the decoder. On synthetic image datasets consisting of objects, we provide evidence that this model can achieve comparable object disentanglement to existing models that use more explicit object-centric priors.
Jack Brady, Julius von Kügelgen, Sébastien Lachapelle, Simon Buchholz, Thomas Kipf, Wieland Brendel
ICLR1
2024 Provable Compositional Generalization for Object-Centric Learning
abstract
Learning representations that generalize to novel compositions of known concepts is crucial for bridging the gap between human and machine perception. One prominent effort is learning object-centric representations, which are widely conjectured to enable compositional generalization. Yet, it remains unclear when this conjecture will be true, as a principled theoretical or empirical understanding of compositional generalization is lacking. In this work, we investigate when compositional generalization is guaranteed for object-centric representations through the lens of identifiability theory. We show that autoencoders that satisfy structural assumptions on the decoder and enforce encoder-decoder consistency will learn object-centric representations that provably generalize compositionally. We validate our theoretical result and highlight the practical relevance of our assumptions through experiments on synthetic image data.
Thaddäus Wiedemer, Jack Brady, Alexander Panfilov, Attila Juhos, Matthias Bethge, Wieland Brendel
ICLR2
2023 Provably Learning Object-Centric Representations
abstract
Learning structured representations of the visual world in terms of objects promises to significantly improve the generalization abilities of current machine learning models. While recent efforts to this end have shown promising empirical progress, a theoretical account of when unsupervised object-centric representation learning is possible is still lacking. Consequently, understanding the reasons for the success of existing object-centric methods as well as designing new theoretically grounded methods remains challenging. In the present work, we analyze when object-centric representations can provably be learned without supervision. To this end, we first introduce two assumptions on the generative process for scenes comprised of several objects, which we call compositionality and irreducibility. Under this generative process, we prove that the ground-truth object representations can be identified by an invertible and compositional inference model, even in the presence of dependencies between objects. We empirically validate our results through experiments on synthetic data. Finally, we provide evidence that our theory holds predictive power for existing object-centric models by showing a close correspondence between models’ compositionality and invertibility and their empirical identifiability.
Jack Brady, Roland S. Zimmermann, Yash Sharma 0001, Bernhard Schölkopf, Julius von Kügelgen, Wieland Brendel
ICML1
2022 Embrace the Gap: VAEs Perform Independent Mechanism Analysis
abstract
Variational autoencoders (VAEs) are a popular framework for modeling complex data distributions; they can be efficiently trained via variational inference by maximizing the evidence lower bound (ELBO), at the expense of a gap to the exact (log-)marginal likelihood. While VAEs are commonly used for representation learning, it is unclear why ELBO maximization would yield useful representations, since unregularized maximum likelihood estimation cannot invert the data-generating process. Yet, VAEs often succeed at this task. We seek to elucidate this apparent paradox by studying nonlinear VAEs in the limit of near-deterministic decoders. We first prove that, in this regime, the optimal encoder approximately inverts the decoder---a commonly used but unproven conjecture---which we refer to as self-consistency. Leveraging self-consistency, we show that the ELBO converges to a regularized log-likelihood. This allows VAEs to perform what has recently been termed independent mechanism analysis (IMA): it adds an inductive bias towards decoders with column-orthogonal Jacobians, which helps recovering the true latent factors. The gap between ELBO and log-likelihood is therefore welcome, since it bears unanticipated benefits for nonlinear representation learning. In experiments on synthetic and image data, we show that VAEs uncover the true latent factors when the data generating process satisfies the IMA assumption.
Patrik Reizinger, Luigi Gresele, Jack Brady, Julius von Kügelgen, Dominik Zietlow, Bernhard Schölkopf, Georg Martius, Wieland Brendel, Michel Besserve
NeurIPS3