Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maureen Keegan
dblp:322/4492
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
0000-0002-2685-1458ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Automated reasoning and model checking · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 1, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Automated reasoning and model checking
controller synthesis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Control and Discovery of Environment Behaviour · IEEE Trans. Software Eng. 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
modal transition systems · 0.6labeled transition systems · 0.6GR(1) goals · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Control and Discovery of Environment BehaviourabstractAn important ability of self-adaptive systems is to be able to autonomously understand the environment in which they operate and use this knowledge to control the environment behaviour in such a way that system goals are achieved. How can this be achieved when the environment is unknown? Two phase solutions that require a full discovery of environment behaviour before computing a strategy that can guarantee the goals or report the non-existence of such a strategy (i.e., unrealisability) are impractical as the environment may exhibit adversarial behaviour to avoid full discovery. In this paper we formalise a control and discovery problem for reactive system environments. In our approach a strategy must be produced that will, for every environment, guarantee that unrealisablity will be correctly concluded or system goals will be achieved by controlling the environment behaviour. We present a solution applicable to environments characterisable as labeled transition systems (LTS). We use modal transition systems (MTS) to represent partial knowledge of environment behaviour, and rely on MTS controller synthesis to make exploration decisions. Each decision either contributes more knowledge about the environment's behaviour or contributes to achieving the system goals. We present an implementation restricted to GR(1) goals and show its viability. Maureen Keegan, Víctor A. Braberman, Nicolás D'Ippolito, Nir Piterman, Sebastián Uchitel |
IEEE Trans. Software Eng. | 1 |