Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Vera Nieto

dblp:322/5606 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-8791-0274ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Image and video coding · 65% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 35%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Information extraction and text analysis · 77% Vision and language · 23%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Image and video coding › image quality assessment
image aesthetics assessment
1.222023
A Retrieval System for Images and Videos based on Aesthetic Assessment of Visuals · SIGIR 2023
Understanding Aesthetics with Language: A Photo Critique Dataset for Aesthetic Assessment · NeurIPS 2022
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › multimedia retrieval › content-based retrieval
image and video retrieval
0.712023
A Retrieval System for Images and Videos based on Aesthetic Assessment of Visuals · SIGIR 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.612022
Understanding Aesthetics with Language: A Photo Critique Dataset for Aesthetic Assessment · NeurIPS 2022
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
text-rich image understanding
0.212022
Understanding Aesthetics with Language: A Photo Critique Dataset for Aesthetic Assessment · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sentiment analysis · 1.1ranking model · 1.1machine learning · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 A Retrieval System for Images and Videos based on Aesthetic Assessment of Visuals
abstract
Attractive images or videos are the visual backbones of journalism and social media to gain the user's attention. From trailers to teaser images to image galleries, appealing visuals have only grown in importance over the years. However, selecting eye-catching shots from a video or the perfect image from large image collections is a challenging and time-consuming task. We present our tool that can assess image and video content from an aesthetic standpoint. We discovered that it is possible to perform such an assessment by combining expert knowledge with data-driven information. We combine the relevant aesthetic features and machine learning algorithms into an aesthetics retrieval system, which enables users to sort uploaded visuals based on an aesthetic score and interact with additional photographic, cinematic, and person-specific features.
Daniel Vera Nieto, Saikishore Kalloori, Fabio Zünd, Clara Fernandez-Labrador, Marc Willhaus, Severin Klingler, Markus Gross 0001
SIGIR1
2022 Understanding Aesthetics with Language: A Photo Critique Dataset for Aesthetic Assessment
abstract
Computational inference of aesthetics is an ill-defined task due to its subjective nature. Many datasets have been proposed to tackle the problem by providing pairs of images and aesthetic scores based on human ratings. However, humans are better at expressing their opinion, taste, and emotions by means of language rather than summarizing them in a single number. In fact, photo critiques provide much richer information as they reveal how and why users rate the aesthetics of visual stimuli. In this regard, we propose the Reddit Photo Critique Dataset (RPCD), which contains tuples of image and photo critiques. RPCD consists of 74K images and 220K comments and is collected from a Reddit community used by hobbyists and professional photographers to improve their photography skills by leveraging constructive community feedback. The proposed dataset differs from previous aesthetics datasets mainly in three aspects, namely (i) the large scale of the dataset and the extension of the comments criticizing different aspects of the image, (ii) it contains mostly UltraHD images, and (iii) it can easily be extended to new data as it is collected through an automatic pipeline. To the best of our knowledge, in this work, we propose the first attempt to estimate the aesthetic quality of visual stimuli from the critiques. To this end, we exploit the polarity of the sentiment of criticism as an indicator of aesthetic judgment. We demonstrate how sentiment polarity correlates positively with the aesthetic judgment available for two aesthetic assessment benchmarks. Finally, we experiment with several models by using the sentiment scores as a target for ranking images. Dataset and baselines are available https://github.com/mediatechnologycenter/aestheval.
Daniel Vera Nieto, Luigi Celona, Clara Fernandez-Labrador
NeurIPS1