Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sewon Park 0004
dblp:322/5828
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-6811-4632ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Generative modeling · 67% Learning paradigms · 33% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › data balancing
oversampling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SOS: Score-based Oversampling for Tabular Data · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
score-based generative model |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SOS: Score-based Oversampling for Tabular Data · KDD 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
tabular data generation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SOS: Score-based Oversampling for Tabular Data · KDD 2022 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification
imbalanced classification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SOS: Score-based Oversampling for Tabular Data · KDD 2022 |
Data mining › predictive modeling › classification › imbalanced classification
oversampling |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | SOS: Score-based Oversampling for Tabular Data · KDD 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
score-based generative model · 1.1fine-tuning · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | TSGM: Regular and Irregular Time-Series Generation Using Score-Based Generative Models
Haksoo Lim, Jaehoon Lee 0002, Sewon Park 0004, Noseong Park |
IEEE Big Data | 3 |
| 2023 | MadSGM: Multivariate Anomaly Detection with Score-based Generative ModelsabstractThe time-series anomaly detection is one of the most fundamental tasks for time-series. Unlike the time-series forecasting and classification, the time-series anomaly detection typically requires unsupervised (or self-supervised) training since collecting and labeling anomalous observations are difficult. In addition, most existing methods resort to limited forms of anomaly measurements and therefore, it is not clear whether they are optimal in all circumstances. To this end, we present a multivariate time-series anomaly detector based on score-based generative models, called MadSGM, which considers the broadest ever set of anomaly measurement factors: i) reconstruction-based, ii) density-based, and iii) gradient-based anomaly measurements. We also design a conditional score network and its denoising score matching loss for the time-series anomaly detection. Experiments on five real-world benchmark datasets illustrate that MadSGM achieves the most robust and accurate predictions. Haksoo Lim, Sewon Park 0004, Jaehoon Lee 0002, Seonkyu Lim, Noseong Park |
CIKM | 2 |
| 2022 | SOS: Score-based Oversampling for Tabular DataabstractScore-based generative models (SGMs) are a recent breakthrough in generating fake images. SGMs are known to surpass other generative models, e.g., generative adversarial networks (GANs) and variational autoencoders (VAEs). Being inspired by their big success, in this work, we fully customize them for generating fake tabular data. In particular, we are interested in oversampling minor classes since imbalanced classes frequently lead to sub-optimal training outcomes. To our knowledge, we are the first presenting a score-based tabular data oversampling method. Firstly, we re-design our own score network since we have to process tabular data. Secondly, we propose two options for our generation method: the former is equivalent to a style transfer for tabular data and the latter uses the standard generative policy of SGMs. Lastly, we define a fine-tuning method, which further enhances the oversampling quality. In our experiments with 6 datasets and 10 baselines, our method outperforms other oversampling methods in all cases. Jayoung Kim 0002, Chaejeong Lee, Yehjin Shin, Sewon Park 0004, Noseong Park |
KDD | 4 |