Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yuntong Xie

dblp:322/7371 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Debugging and program repair · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Debugging and program repair
automated program repair
0.612022
Towards Boosting Patch Execution On-the-Fly · ICSE 2022
Debugging and program repair › automated program repair
patch prioritization
0.612022
Towards Boosting Patch Execution On-the-Fly · ICSE 2022
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Towards Boosting Patch Execution On-the-Fly
abstract
Program repair is an integral part of every software system's life-cycle but can be extremely challenging. To date, various automated program repair (APR) techniques have been proposed to reduce manual debugging efforts. However, given a real-world buggy program, a typical APR technique can generate a large number of patches, each of which needs to be validated against the original test suite, incurring extremely high computation costs. Although existing APR techniques have already leveraged various static and/or dynamic information to find the desired patches faster, they are still rather costly. In this work, we propose SeAPR (Self-Boosted Automated Program Repair), the first general-purpose technique to leverage the earlier patch execution information during APR to directly boost existing APR techniques themselves on-the-fly. Our basic intuition is that patches similar to earlier high-quality/low-quality patches should be promoted/degraded to speed up the detection of the desired patches. The experimental study on 13 state-of-the-art APR tools demonstrates that, overall, SeAPR can substantially reduce the number of patch executions with negligible overhead. Our study also investigates the impact of various configurations on SeAPR. Lastly, our study demonstrates that SeAPR can even leverage the historical patch execution information from other APR tools for the same buggy program to further boost the current APR tool.
Samuel Benton, Yuntong Xie, Lan Lu, Mengshi Zhang, Xia Li 0009, Lingming Zhang 0001
ICSE2