Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Gilad Adler
dblp:322/8537
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 65% Learning theory · 18% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 11% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
meta-reinforcement learning |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | MAMBA: an Effective World Model Approach for Meta-Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2024 Meta Reinforcement Learning with Finite Training Tasks - a Density Estimation Approach · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › meta-reinforcement learning
model-based meta reinforcement learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | MAMBA: an Effective World Model Approach for Meta-Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › PAC learning
PAC analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Meta Reinforcement Learning with Finite Training Tasks - a Density Estimation Approach · NeurIPS 2022 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Planning, search and constraint satisfaction › planning under uncertainty
partially observable markov decision process |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | MAMBA: an Effective World Model Approach for Meta-Reinforcement Learning · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
density estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Meta Reinforcement Learning with Finite Training Tasks - a Density Estimation Approach · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
kernel density estimation |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Meta Reinforcement Learning with Finite Training Tasks - a Density Estimation Approach · NeurIPS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
world model · 0.8dimensionality reduction · 0.6density estimation · 0.6VariBAD · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | MAMBA: an Effective World Model Approach for Meta-Reinforcement LearningabstractMeta-reinforcement learning (meta-RL) is a promising framework for tackling challenging domains requiring efficient exploration. Existing meta-RL algorithms are characterized by low sample efficiency, and mostly focus on low-dimensional task distributions. In parallel, model-based RL methods have been successful in solving partially observable MDPs, of which meta-RL is a special case.
In this work, we leverage this success and propose a new model-based approach to meta-RL, based on elements from existing state-of-the-art model-based and meta-RL methods. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our approach on common meta-RL benchmark domains, attaining greater return with better sample efficiency (up to $15\times$) while requiring very little hyperparameter tuning. In addition, we validate our approach on a slate of more challenging, higher-dimensional domains, taking a step towards real-world generalizing agents. Zohar Rimon, Tom Jurgenson, Orr Krupnik, Gilad Adler, Aviv Tamar |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2022 | Meta Reinforcement Learning with Finite Training Tasks - a Density Estimation ApproachabstractIn meta reinforcement learning (meta RL), an agent learns from a set of training tasks how to quickly solve a new task, drawn from the same task distribution. The optimal meta RL policy, a.k.a.~the Bayes-optimal behavior, is well defined, and guarantees optimal reward in expectation, taken with respect to the task distribution. The question we explore in this work is how many training tasks are required to guarantee approximately optimal behavior with high probability. Recent work provided the first such PAC analysis for a model-free setting, where a history-dependent policy was learned from the training tasks. In this work, we propose a different approach: directly learn the task distribution, using density estimation techniques, and then train a policy on the learned task distribution. We show that our approach leads to bounds that depend on the dimension of the task distribution. In particular, in settings where the task distribution lies in a low-dimensional manifold, we extend our analysis to use dimensionality reduction techniques and account for such structure, obtaining significantly better bounds than previous work, which strictly depend on the number of states and actions. The key of our approach is the regularization implied by the kernel density estimation method. We further demonstrate that this regularization is useful in practice, when `plugged in' the state-of-the-art VariBAD meta RL algorithm. Zohar Rimon, Aviv Tamar, Gilad Adler |
NeurIPS | 3 |