Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

James Tlhomole

dblp:322/9358 · also James B. Tlhomole · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computer animation and physical simulation · 50% Image and video processing · 50%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow
0.612022
Learning to Estimate and Refine Fluid Motion with Physical Dynamics · ICML 2022
Image and video processing › motion estimation
fluid flow estimation
0.612022
Learning to Estimate and Refine Fluid Motion with Physical Dynamics · ICML 2022
Computer animation and physical simulation
fluid simulation
0.612022
Learning to Estimate and Refine Fluid Motion with Physical Dynamics · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unsupervised learning · 1.1operator splitting · 1.1PDE-constrained prediction · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Learning to Estimate and Refine Fluid Motion with Physical Dynamics
abstract
Extracting information on fluid motion directly from images is challenging. Fluid flow represents a complex dynamic system governed by the Navier-Stokes equations. General optical flow methods are typically designed for rigid body motion, and thus struggle if applied to fluid motion estimation directly. Further, optical flow methods only focus on two consecutive frames without utilising historical temporal information, while the fluid motion (velocity field) can be considered a continuous trajectory constrained by time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs). This discrepancy has the potential to induce physically inconsistent estimations. Here we propose an unsupervised learning based prediction-correction scheme for fluid flow estimation. An estimate is first given by a PDE-constrained optical flow predictor, which is then refined by a physical based corrector. The proposed approach outperforms optical flow methods and shows competitive results compared to existing supervised learning based methods on a benchmark dataset. Furthermore, the proposed approach can generalize to complex real-world fluid scenarios where ground truth information is effectively unknowable. Finally, experiments demonstrate that the physical corrector can refine flow estimates by mimicking the operator splitting method commonly utilised in fluid dynamical simulation.
James Tlhomole, Matthew D. Piggott
ICML3