Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
James Tlhomole
dblp:322/9358 · also James B. Tlhomole
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Computer animation and physical simulation · 50% Image and video processing · 50% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
3D vision · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning to Estimate and Refine Fluid Motion with Physical Dynamics · ICML 2022 |
Image and video processing › motion estimation
fluid flow estimation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning to Estimate and Refine Fluid Motion with Physical Dynamics · ICML 2022 |
Computer animation and physical simulation
fluid simulation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning to Estimate and Refine Fluid Motion with Physical Dynamics · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
unsupervised learning · 1.1operator splitting · 1.1PDE-constrained prediction · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Learning to Estimate and Refine Fluid Motion with Physical DynamicsabstractExtracting information on fluid motion directly from images is challenging. Fluid flow represents a complex dynamic system governed by the Navier-Stokes equations. General optical flow methods are typically designed for rigid body motion, and thus struggle if applied to fluid motion estimation directly. Further, optical flow methods only focus on two consecutive frames without utilising historical temporal information, while the fluid motion (velocity field) can be considered a continuous trajectory constrained by time-dependent partial differential equations (PDEs). This discrepancy has the potential to induce physically inconsistent estimations. Here we propose an unsupervised learning based prediction-correction scheme for fluid flow estimation. An estimate is first given by a PDE-constrained optical flow predictor, which is then refined by a physical based corrector. The proposed approach outperforms optical flow methods and shows competitive results compared to existing supervised learning based methods on a benchmark dataset. Furthermore, the proposed approach can generalize to complex real-world fluid scenarios where ground truth information is effectively unknowable. Finally, experiments demonstrate that the physical corrector can refine flow estimates by mimicking the operator splitting method commonly utilised in fluid dynamical simulation. James Tlhomole, Matthew D. Piggott |
ICML | 3 |