Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ee Yeo Keat

dblp:323/0648 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0001-6935-3101ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 5 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 52% Question answering and dialogue systems · 18% Video understanding and tracking · 16%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
knowledge graph
1.012026
PKR-QA: A Benchmark for Procedural Knowledge Reasoning with Knowledge Module Learning · AAAI 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
neuro-symbolic reasoning
1.012026
PKR-QA: A Benchmark for Procedural Knowledge Reasoning with Knowledge Module Learning · AAAI 2026
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › motion analysis
human motion understanding
0.912025
Imore: Implicit Program-Guided Reasoning for Human Motion QA · ICCV 2025
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
program-guided reasoning
0.912025
Imore: Implicit Program-Guided Reasoning for Human Motion QA · ICCV 2025
Computer vision › Vision and language › visual reasoning
visual abductive reasoning
0.812024
RCA: Region Conditioned Adaptation for Visual Abductive Reasoning · ACM Multimedia 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural module · 1.0large language model · 1.0graph traversal · 1.0implicit reasoning · 0.9region conditioning · 0.8adaptation · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 PKR-QA: A Benchmark for Procedural Knowledge Reasoning with Knowledge Module Learning
abstract
We introduce PKR-QA (Procedural Knowledge Reasoning Question Answering), a new benchmark for question answering over procedural tasks that require structured reasoning. PKR-QA is constructed semi-automatically using a procedural knowledge graph (PKG), which encodes task-specific knowledge across diverse domains. The PKG is built by curating and linking information from the COIN instructional video dataset and the ontology, enriched with commonsense knowledge from ConceptNet and structured outputs from Large Language Models (LLMs), followed by manual verification. To generate question-answer pairs, we design graph traversal templates where each template is applied systematically over PKG. To enable interpretable reasoning, we propose a neurosymbolic approach called Knowledge Module Learning (KML), which learns procedural relations via neural modules and composes them for structured reasoning with LLMs. Experiments demonstrate that this paradigm improves reasoning performance on PKR-QA and enables step-by-step reasoning traces that facilitate interpretability.
Thanh-Son Nguyen 0001, Tzeh Yuan Neoh, Hao Zhang 0047, Ee Yeo Keat, Basura Fernando
AAAI5
2026 Improving Temporal Action Segmentation via Constraint-Aware Decoding
Ee Yeo Keat, Debaditya Roy, Hao Zhang 0047, Basura Fernando
ICPR (11)1
2025 Imore: Implicit Program-Guided Reasoning for Human Motion QA
Chinthani Sugandhika, Ee Yeo Keat, Eric P. Xing, Deepu Rajan, Basura Fernando
ICCV3
2025 Deduce and Select Evidences with Language Models for Training-Free Video Goal Inference
abstract
We introduce ViDSE, a Video framework that Deduce and Selects visual Evidence for training-free video goal inference using language models. Unlike approaches that directly apply vision-language models (VLM) or combine VLM+LLM to process dense video visuals, ViDSE explicitly selects relevant visual evidence (e.g., frames) based on the hypothesis deduced by the LLM. This approach not only im-proves accuracy but also reveals the logical process behind the model's decisions, enhancing explainability. Our exper-iments demonstrate that this selection process significantly reduces ambiguity in the subsequent inference reasoning stage and outperforms VLM-only and VLM+LLM models on goal inference tasks such as CrossTask and COIN. We further validate ViDSE’ s generalizability and robustness on action recognition tasks, such as ActivityNet and UCF-101, under training-free and open-vocabulary conditions. We observe that ViDSE easily generalizes to other video tasks (e.g., action recognition) requiring filtering of redundant and irrelevant information.
Ee Yeo Keat, Hao Zhang 0047, Alexander Matyasko, Basura Fernando
WACV1
2024 RCA: Region Conditioned Adaptation for Visual Abductive Reasoning
Hao Zhang 0047, Ee Yeo Keat, Basura Fernando
ACM Multimedia2