Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shreyas Havaldar
dblp:323/1740
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 38% Learning paradigms · 38% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 19% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference
belief propagation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning from Label Proportions: Bootstrapping Supervised Learners via Belief Propagation · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fairness under Covariate Shift: Improving Fairness-Accuracy Tradeoff with Few Unlabeled Test Samples · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › fairness trade-off
fairness-accuracy trade-off |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Fairness under Covariate Shift: Improving Fairness-Accuracy Tradeoff with Few Unlabeled Test Samples · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › weakly supervised learning
learning from label proportions |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning from Label Proportions: Bootstrapping Supervised Learners via Belief Propagation · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › semi-supervised learning
pseudo-labeling |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning from Label Proportions: Bootstrapping Supervised Learners via Belief Propagation · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation › domain shift
covariate shift |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Fairness under Covariate Shift: Improving Fairness-Accuracy Tradeoff with Few Unlabeled Test Samples · AAAI 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weighted entropy objective · 0.8representation matching loss · 0.8pseudo-labeling · 0.8gibbs distribution · 0.8belief propagation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning from Label Proportions and Covariate-shifted InstancesabstractIn many applications, especially due to lack of supervision or privacy concerns, the training data is grouped into bags of instances (feature-vectors) and for each bag we have only an aggregate label derived from the instance-labels in the bag. In learning from label proportions (LLP) the aggregate label is the average of the instance-labels in a bag, and a significant body of work has focused on training models in the LLP setting to predict instance-labels. In practice however, the training data may have fully supervised albeit covariate-shifted source data, along with the usual target data with bag-labels, and we wish to train a good instance-level predictor on the target domain. We call this the covariate-shifted hybrid LLP problem. Fully supervised covariate shifted data often has useful training signals and the goal is to leverage them for better predictive performance in the hybrid LLP setting. To achieve this, we develop methods for hybrid LLP which naturally incorporate the target bag-labels along with the source instance-labels, in the domain adaptation framework. Apart from proving theoretical guarantees bounding the target generalization error, we also conduct experiments on several publicly available datasets showing that our methods outperform LLP and domain adaptation baselines as well techniques from previous related work. Sagalpreet Singh, Navodita Sharma, Shreyas Havaldar, Rishi Saket, Aravindan Raghuveer |
UAI | 3 |
| 2024 | Fairness under Covariate Shift: Improving Fairness-Accuracy Tradeoff with Few Unlabeled Test SamplesabstractCovariate shift in the test data is a common practical phenomena that can significantly downgrade both the accuracy and the fairness performance of the model. Ensuring fairness across different sensitive groups under covariate shift is of paramount importance due to societal implications like criminal justice. We operate in the unsupervised regime where only a small set of unlabeled test samples along with a labeled training set is available. Towards improving fairness under this highly challenging yet realistic scenario, we make three contributions. First is a novel composite weighted entropy based objective for prediction accuracy which is optimized along with a representation matching loss for fairness. We experimentally verify that optimizing with our loss formulation outperforms a number of state-of-the-art baselines in the pareto sense with respect to the fairness-accuracy tradeoff on several standard datasets. Our second contribution is a new setting we term Asymmetric Covariate Shift that, to the best of our knowledge, has not been studied before. Asymmetric covariate shift occurs when distribution of covariates of one group shifts significantly compared to the other groups and this happens when a dominant group is over-represented. While this setting is extremely challenging for current baselines, We show that our proposed method significantly outperforms them. Our third contribution is theoretical, where we show that our weighted entropy term along with prediction loss on the training set approximates test loss under covariate shift. Empirically and through formal sample complexity bounds, we show that this approximation to the unseen test loss does not depend on importance sampling variance which affects many other baselines. Shreyas Havaldar, Jatin Chauhan, Karthikeyan Shanmugam 0001, Jay Nandy, Aravindan Raghuveer |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2024 | Learning from Label Proportions: Bootstrapping Supervised Learners via Belief PropagationabstractLearning from Label Proportions (LLP) is a learning problem where only aggregate level labels are available for groups of instances, called bags, during training, and the aim is to get the best performance at the instance-level on the test data. This setting arises in domains like advertising and medicine due to privacy considerations. We propose a novel algorithmic framework for this problem that iteratively performs two main steps. For the first step (Pseudo Labeling) in every iteration, we define a Gibbs distribution over binary instance labels that incorporates a) covariate information through the constraint that instances with similar covariates should have similar labels and b) the bag level aggregated label. We then use Belief Propagation (BP) to marginalize the Gibbs distribution to obtain pseudo labels. In the second step (Embedding Refinement), we use the pseudo labels to provide supervision for a learner that yields a better embedding. Further, we iterate on the two steps again by using the second step's embeddings as new covariates for the next iteration. In the final iteration, a classifier is trained using the pseudo labels. Our algorithm displays strong gains against several SOTA baselines (upto **15%**) for the LLP Binary Classification problem on various dataset types - tabular and Image. We achieve these improvements with minimal computational overhead above standard supervised learning due to Belief Propagation, for large bag sizes, even for a million samples. Shreyas Havaldar, Navodita Sharma, Shubhi Sareen, Karthikeyan Shanmugam 0001, Aravindan Raghuveer |
ICLR | 1 |