Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Michael James Higley
dblp:323/4510
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 60% Representation and self-supervised learning · 40% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
multimodal representation learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Shared-AE: Automatic Identification of Shared Subspaces in High-dimensional Neural and Behavioral Activity · ICLR 2025 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › neuroscience › neuroinformatics › neural data analysis
neural activity analysis |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Shared-AE: Automatic Identification of Shared Subspaces in High-dimensional Neural and Behavioral Activity · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural differential equations |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Integro-Differential Equations · AAAI 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › computational neuroscience › neural dynamics
brain dynamics modeling |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Integro-Differential Equations · AAAI 2023 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
computational neuroscience |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Neural Integro-Differential Equations · AAAI 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regularization · 1.7autoencoder · 1.7neural network · 1.3integral operator learning · 1.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Shared-AE: Automatic Identification of Shared Subspaces in High-dimensional Neural and Behavioral ActivityabstractUnderstanding the relationship between behavior and neural activity is crucial for understanding brain function. An effective method is to learn embeddings for interconnected modalities. For simple behavioral tasks, neural features can be learned based on labels. However, complex behaviors, such as social interactions, require the joint extraction of behavioral and neural characteristics. In this paper, we present an autoencoder (AE) framework, called Shared-AE, which includes a novel regularization term that automatically identifies features shared between neural activity and behavior, while simultaneously capturing the unique private features specific to each modality. We apply Shared-AE to large-scale neural activity recorded across the entire dorsal cortex of the mouse, during two very different behaviors: (i) head-fixed mice performing a self-initiated decision-making task, and (ii) freely-moving social behavior amongst two mice. Our model successfully captures both `shared features', shared across neural and behavioral activity, and `private features', unique to each modality, significantly enhancing our understanding of the alignment between neural activity and complex behaviors. The original code for the entire Shared-AE framework on Pytorch has been made publicly available at: \url{https://github.com/saxenalab-neuro/Shared-AE}. Daiyao Yi, Michael James Higley, Anne Churchland, Shreya Saxena |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2023 | Neural Integro-Differential EquationsabstractModeling continuous dynamical systems from discretely sampled observations is a fundamental problem in data science. Often, such dynamics are the result of non-local processes that present an integral over time. As such, these systems are modeled with Integro-Differential Equations (IDEs); generalizations of differential equations that comprise both an integral and a differential component. For example, brain dynamics are not accurately modeled by differential equations since their behavior is non-Markovian, i.e. dynamics are in part dictated by history. Here, we introduce the Neural IDE (NIDE), a novel deep learning framework based on the theory of IDEs where integral operators are learned using neural networks. We test NIDE on several toy and brain activity datasets and demonstrate that NIDE outperforms other models. These tasks include time extrapolation as well as predicting dynamics from unseen initial conditions, which we test on whole-cortex activity recordings in freely behaving mice. Further, we show that NIDE can decompose dynamics into their Markovian and non-Markovian constituents, via the learned integral operator, which we test on fMRI brain activity recordings of people on ketamine. Finally, the integrand of the integral operator provides a latent space that gives insight into the underlying dynamics, which we demonstrate on wide-field brain imaging recordings. Altogether, NIDE is a novel approach that enables modeling of complex non-local dynamics with neural networks. Emanuele Zappala, Antonio H. O. Fonseca, Andrew Henry Moberly, Michael James Higley, Chadi Abdallah, Jessica A. Cardin, David van Dijk |
AAAI | 4 |