Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Joonkee Kim
dblp:323/4661
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Language models and text generation · 42% Reinforcement learning · 31% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 14% |
Topics — the 10 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
adaptive sampling |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AdaSTaR: Adaptive Data Sampling for Training Self-Taught Reasoners · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
self-improvement |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | AdaSTaR: Adaptive Data Sampling for Training Self-Taught Reasoners · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › decoding
decoding strategy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Instructive Decoding: Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models are Self-Refiner from Noisy Instructions · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Instructive Decoding: Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models are Self-Refiner from Noisy Instructions · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
off-policy reinforcement learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PLASTIC: Improving Input and Label Plasticity for Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
plasticity loss |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PLASTIC: Improving Input and Label Plasticity for Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
plasticity preservation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PLASTIC: Improving Input and Label Plasticity for Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
sample efficiency |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | PLASTIC: Improving Input and Label Plasticity for Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | AdaSTaR: Adaptive Data Sampling for Training Self-Taught Reasoners · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
loss landscape |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | PLASTIC: Improving Input and Label Plasticity for Sample Efficient Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rejection sampling fine-tuning · 0.9curriculum learning · 0.9adaptive sampling · 0.9logit adjustment · 0.8contrastive decoding · 0.8smooth minima · 0.7gradient propagation · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | AdaSTaR: Adaptive Data Sampling for Training Self-Taught ReasonersabstractSelf-Taught Reasoners (STaR), synonymously known as Rejection sampling Fine-Tuning (RFT), is an integral part of the training pipeline of self-improving reasoning Language Models (LMs).
The self-improving mechanism often employs random observation (data) sampling.
However, this results in trained observation imbalance; inefficiently over-training on solved examples while under-training on challenging ones.
In response, we introduce Adaptive STaR (AdaSTaR), a novel algorithm that rectifies this by integrating two adaptive sampling principles: (1) Adaptive Sampling for Diversity: promoting balanced training across observations, and (2) Adaptive Sampling for Curriculum: dynamically adjusting data difficulty to match the model's evolving strength. Across six benchmarks, AdaSTaR achieves best test accuracy in all instances (6/6) and reduces training FLOPs by an average of 58.6\% against an extensive list of baselines. These improvements in performance and efficiency generalize to different pre-trained LMs and larger models, paving the way for more efficient and effective self-improving LMs. Reiss Koh, Wonbeen Oh, Jaein Jang, Minhyung Lee, Ah Yeon Kim, Joonkee Kim, Taehyeon Kim 0001, Se-Young Yun |
NeurIPS | 7 |
| 2024 | Instructive Decoding: Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models are Self-Refiner from Noisy InstructionsabstractWhile instruction-tuned language models have demonstrated impressive zero-shot generalization, these models often struggle to generate accurate responses when faced with instructions that fall outside their training set. This paper presents Instructive Decoding (ID), a simple yet effective approach that augments the efficacy of instruction-tuned models. Specifically, ID adjusts the logits for next-token prediction in a contrastive manner, utilizing predictions generated from a manipulated version of the original instruction, referred to as a noisy instruction. This noisy instruction aims to elicit responses that could diverge from the intended instruction yet remain plausible. We conduct experiments across a spectrum of such noisy instructions, ranging from those that insert semantic noise via random words to others like 'opposite' that elicit the deviated responses. Our approach achieves considerable performance gains across various instruction-tuned models and tasks without necessitating any additional parameter updates. Notably, utilizing 'opposite' as the noisy instruction in ID, which shows the maximum divergence from the original instruction, consistently produces the most significant performance gains across multiple models and tasks. Taehyeon Kim 0001, Joonkee Kim, Gihun Lee, Se-Young Yun |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | PLASTIC: Improving Input and Label Plasticity for Sample Efficient Reinforcement LearningabstractIn Reinforcement Learning (RL), enhancing sample efficiency is crucial, particularly in scenarios when data acquisition is costly and risky. In principle, off-policy RL algorithms can improve sample efficiency by allowing multiple updates per environment interaction. However, these multiple updates often lead the model to overfit to earlier interactions, which is referred to as the loss of plasticity. Our study investigates the underlying causes of this phenomenon by dividing plasticity into two aspects. Input plasticity, which denotes the model's adaptability to changing input data, and label plasticity, which denotes the model's adaptability to evolving input-output relationships. Synthetic experiments on the CIFAR-10 dataset reveal that finding smoother minima of loss landscape enhances input plasticity, whereas refined gradient propagation improves label plasticity. Leveraging these findings, we introduce the **PLASTIC** algorithm, which harmoniously combines techniques to address both concerns. With minimal architectural modifications, PLASTIC achieves competitive performance on benchmarks including Atari-100k and Deepmind Control Suite. This result emphasizes the importance of preserving the model's plasticity to elevate the sample efficiency in RL. The code is available at https://github.com/dojeon-ai/plastic. Hanseul Cho 0002, Hyunseung Kim, Daehoon Gwak, Joonkee Kim, Jaegul Choo, Se-Young Yun, Chulhee Yun |
NeurIPS | 5 |