Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jocelyn Ahmed Mazari

dblp:323/5870 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers
Computational science and engineering · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 87% 3D vision · 13%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computational science and engineering
computational fluid dynamics
1.422025
ML4CFD Competition: Results and Retrospective Analysis · NeurIPS 2025
AirfRANS: High Fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics Dataset for Approximating Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions · NeurIPS 2022
Computational science and engineering › scientific machine learning
surrogate modeling
1.422025
ML4CFD Competition: Results and Retrospective Analysis · NeurIPS 2025
AirfRANS: High Fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics Dataset for Approximating Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions · NeurIPS 2022
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning
0.912025
ML4CFD Competition: Results and Retrospective Analysis · NeurIPS 2025
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network
0.612022
AirfRANS: High Fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics Dataset for Approximating Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scientific machine learning
0.612022
AirfRANS: High Fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics Dataset for Approximating Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions · NeurIPS 2022
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.312025
ML4CFD Competition: Results and Retrospective Analysis · NeurIPS 2025
Computer vision › 3D vision
geometric deep learning
0.212022
AirfRANS: High Fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics Dataset for Approximating Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

machine learning surrogate modeling · 1.7OpenFOAM · 1.7neural surrogate models · 1.1deep learning · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 ML4CFD Competition: Results and Retrospective Analysis
abstract
The integration of machine learning (ML) into the physical sciences is reshaping computational paradigms, offering the potential to accelerate demanding simulations such as computational fluid dynamics (CFD). Yet, persistent challenges in accuracy, generalization, and physical consistency hinder the practical deployment of ML models in scientific domains. To address these limitations and systematically benchmark progress, we organized the ML4CFD competition, centered on surrogate modeling for aerodynamic simulations over two-dimensional airfoils. The competition attracted over 240 teams, who were provided with a curated dataset generated via OpenFOAM and evaluated through a multi-criteria framework encompassing predictive accuracy, physical fidelity, computational efficiency, and out-of-distribution generalization. This retrospective analysis reviews the competition outcomes, highlighting several approaches that outperformed baselines under our global evaluation score. Notably, the top entry exceeded the performance of the original OpenFOAM solver on aggregate metrics, illustrating the promise of ML based surrogates to outperform traditional solvers under tailored criteria. However, this does not imply that the winning solution could replace the OpenFOAM solver or that it was overall superior, even for this specific task. Drawing from these results, we analyze the key design principles of top submissions, assess the robustness of our evaluation framework, and offer guidance for future scientific ML challenges.
Mouadh Yagoubi, David Danan, Milad Leyli-Abadi, Jocelyn Ahmed Mazari, Jean-Patrick Brunet, Abbas Kabalan, Fabien Casenave, Giovanni Catalani, Jean Fesquet, Jacob Helwig, Haiyang Yu 0005, Xavier Bertrand, Frederic Tost, Michael Bauerheim, Joseph Morlier, Shuiwang Ji
NeurIPS4
2025 Byzantine fault tolerance in distributed machine learning: a survey
abstract
Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT) is crucial for ensuring the resilience of Distributed Machine Learning (DML) systems during training under adversarial conditions. Among the rising corpus of research on BFT in DML, there is no comprehensive classification of techniques or broad analysis of different approaches. This paper provides an in-depth survey of recent advancements in BFT for DML, with a focus on first-order optimisation methods, particularly, the popular one Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) during the training phase. We offer a novel classification of BFT approaches based on characteristics such as the communication process, optimisation method, and topology setting. This classification aims to enhance the understanding of various BFT methods and guide future research in addressing open challenges in the field. This work provides the foundations for developing robust BFT systems, using a variety of optimisation methods to strengthen resilience.
Djamila Bouhata, Moumen Hamouma, Jocelyn Ahmed Mazari, Ahcène Bounceur
J. Exp. Theor. Artif. Intell.3
2022 AirfRANS: High Fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics Dataset for Approximating Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutions
abstract
Surrogate models are necessary to optimize meaningful quantities in physical dynamics as their recursive numerical resolutions are often prohibitively expensive. It is mainly the case for fluid dynamics and the resolution of Navier–Stokes equations. However, despite the fast-growing field of data-driven models for physical systems, reference datasets representing real-world phenomena are lacking. In this work, we develop \textsc{AirfRANS}, a dataset for studying the two-dimensional incompressible steady-state Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes equations over airfoils at a subsonic regime and for different angles of attacks. We also introduce metrics on the stress forces at the surface of geometries and visualization of boundary layers to assess the capabilities of models to accurately predict the meaningful information of the problem. Finally, we propose deep learning baselines on four machine learning tasks to study \textsc{AirfRANS} under different constraints for generalization considerations: big and scarce data regime, Reynolds number, and angle of attack extrapolation.
Florent Bonnet, Jocelyn Ahmed Mazari, Paola Cinnella, Patrick Gallinari
NeurIPS2