Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Mohamad Amin Mohamadi

dblp:323/6299 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0995-4081ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Learning theory · 29% Optimization for machine learning · 26% Deep learning architectures and training · 25%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network kernels
neural tangent kernel
1.222023
A Fast, Well-Founded Approximation to the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernel · ICML 2023
Making Look-Ahead Active Learning Strategies Feasible with Neural Tangent Kernels · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adam
0.912025
Adam Exploits ℓ∞-geometry of Loss Landscape via Coordinate-wise Adaptivity · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
generalization
0.812024
Why Do You Grok? A Theoretical Analysis on Grokking Modular Addition · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › training dynamics
grokking
0.812024
Why Do You Grok? A Theoretical Analysis on Grokking Modular Addition · ICML 2024
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods
0.712023
A Fast, Well-Founded Approximation to the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernel · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
active learning
0.612022
Making Look-Ahead Active Learning Strategies Feasible with Neural Tangent Kernels · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling
0.212022
Making Look-Ahead Active Learning Strategies Feasible with Neural Tangent Kernels · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › incremental learning
streaming learning
0.212022
Making Look-Ahead Active Learning Strategies Feasible with Neural Tangent Kernels · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

coordinate-wise adaptivity · 1.7l-infinity regularization · 0.8gradient descent analysis · 0.8sum of logits approximation · 0.7convergence proof · 0.7stochastic gradient descent · 0.6neural tangent kernel · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Adam Exploits ℓ∞-geometry of Loss Landscape via Coordinate-wise Adaptivity
Shuo Xie, Mohamad Amin Mohamadi
ICLR2
2024 Why Do You Grok? A Theoretical Analysis on Grokking Modular Addition
abstract
We present a theoretical explanation of the “grokking” phenomenon (Power et al., 2022), where a model generalizes long after overfitting, for the originally-studied problem of modular addition. First, we show that early in gradient descent, so that the “kernel regime” approximately holds, no permutation-equivariant model can achieve small population error on modular addition unless it sees at least a constant fraction of all possible data points. Eventually, however, models escape the kernel regime. We show that one-hidden-layer quadratic networks that achieve zero training loss with bounded $\ell_\infty$ norm generalize well with substantially fewer training points, and further show such networks exist and can be found by gradient descent with small $\ell_\infty$ regularization. We further provide empirical evidence that these networks leave the kernel regime only after initially overfitting. Taken together, our results strongly support the case for grokking as a consequence of the transition from kernel-like behavior to limiting behavior of gradient descent on deep networks.
Mohamad Amin Mohamadi, Danica J. Sutherland
ICML1
2023 A Fast, Well-Founded Approximation to the Empirical Neural Tangent Kernel
abstract
Empirical neural tangent kernels (eNTKs) can provide a good understanding of a given network's representation: they are often far less expensive to compute and applicable more broadly than infinite-width NTKs. For networks with $O$ output units (e.g. an $O$-class classifier), however, the eNTK on $N$ inputs is of size $NO \times NO$, taking $\mathcal O\big( (N O)^2\big)$ memory and up to $\mathcal O\big( (N O)^3 \big)$ computation to use. Most existing applications have therefore used one of a handful of approximations yielding $N \times N$ kernel matrices, saving orders of magnitude of computation, but with limited to no justification. We prove that one such approximation, which we call "sum of logits," converges to the true eNTK at initialization. Our experiments demonstrate the quality of this approximation for various uses across a range of settings.
Mohamad Amin Mohamadi, Wonho Bae, Danica J. Sutherland
ICML1
2022 Making Look-Ahead Active Learning Strategies Feasible with Neural Tangent Kernels
abstract
We propose a new method for approximating active learning acquisition strategies that are based on retraining with hypothetically-labeled candidate data points. Although this is usually infeasible with deep networks, we use the neural tangent kernel to approximate the result of retraining, and prove that this approximation works asymptotically even in an active learning setup -- approximating look-ahead'' selection criteria with far less computation required. This also enables us to conduct sequential active learning, i.e.\ updating the model in a streaming regime, without needing to retrain the model with SGD after adding each new data point. Moreover, our querying strategy, which better understands how the model's predictions will change by adding new data points in comparison to the standard (myopic'') criteria, beats other look-ahead strategies by large margins, and achieves equal or better performance compared to state-of-the-art methods on several benchmark datasets in pool-based active learning.
Mohamad Amin Mohamadi, Wonho Bae, Danica J. Sutherland
NeurIPS1