EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Yunhan Xing
dblp:323/7629
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0000-1467-4362ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program verification · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › verification
robustness verification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Abstraction and Refinement: Towards Scalable and Exact Verification of Neural Networks · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2024 |
Program verification › abstraction refinement
counterexample-guided abstraction refinement |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Abstraction and Refinement: Towards Scalable and Exact Verification of Neural Networks · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2024 |
Program verification
neural network verification |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Abstraction and Refinement: Towards Scalable and Exact Verification of Neural Networks · ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
symbolic verification · 1.5over-approximation · 1.5counterexample-guided abstraction refinement · 1.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Abstraction and Refinement: Towards Scalable and Exact Verification of Neural NetworksabstractAs a new programming paradigm, deep neural networks (DNNs) have been increasingly deployed in practice, but the lack of robustness hinders their applications in safety-critical domains. While there are techniques for verifying DNNs with formal guarantees, they are limited in scalability and accuracy. In this article, we present a novel counterexample-guided abstraction refinement (CEGAR) approach for scalable and exact verification of DNNs. Specifically, we propose a novel abstraction to break down the size of DNNs by over-approximation. The result of verifying the abstract DNN is conclusive if no spurious counterexample is reported. To eliminate each spurious counterexample introduced by abstraction, we propose a novel counterexample-guided refinement that refines the abstract DNN to exclude the spurious counterexample while still over-approximating the original one, leading to a sound, complete yet efficient CEGAR approach. Our approach is orthogonal to and can be integrated with many existing verification techniques. For demonstration, we implement our approach using two promising tools, Marabou and Planet , as the underlying verification engines, and evaluate on widely used benchmarks for three datasets ACAS , Xu , MNIST , and CIFAR-10 . The results show that our approach can boost their performance by solving more problems in the same time limit, reducing on average 13.4%–86.3% verification time of Marabou on almost all the verification tasks, and reducing on average 8.3%–78.0% verification time of Planet on all the verification tasks. Compared to the most relevant CEGAR-based approach, our approach is 11.6–26.6 times faster. Jiaxiang Liu 0001, Yunhan Xing, Xiaomu Shi, Fu Song, Zhiwu Xu 0001, Zhong Ming 0001 |
ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. | 2 |