Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Aliasghar Khani

dblp:323/8185 · also Ali Asghar Khani · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
4since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Segmentation and scene understanding · 39% Trustworthy machine learning · 34% Deep learning architectures and training · 15%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › semantic segmentation
few-shot segmentation
0.812024
SLiMe: Segment Like Me · ICLR 2024
Computer vision › Segmentation and scene understanding › annotation-efficient segmentation
one-shot segmentation
0.812024
SLiMe: Segment Like Me · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data augmentation
feature masking
0.612022
MaskTune: Mitigating Spurious Correlations by Forcing to Explore · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.612022
MaskTune: Mitigating Spurious Correlations by Forcing to Explore · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › spurious correlation
spurious correlation mitigation
0.612022
MaskTune: Mitigating Spurious Correlations by Forcing to Explore · NeurIPS 2022
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.212024
SLiMe: Segment Like Me · ICLR 2024
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model
0.212024
SLiMe: Segment Like Me · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
selective classification
0.212022
MaskTune: Mitigating Spurious Correlations by Forcing to Explore · NeurIPS 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

text embedding optimization · 0.8stable diffusion · 0.8attention map · 0.8masking · 0.6fine-tuning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 SLiMe: Segment Like Me
abstract
Significant strides have been made using large vision-language models, like Stable Diffusion (SD), for a variety of downstream tasks, including image generation, image editing, and 3D shape generation. Inspired by these advancements, we explore leveraging these vision-language models for segmenting images at any desired granularity using as few as one annotated sample. We propose SLiMe, which frames this problem as an optimization task. Specifically, given a single image and its segmentation mask, we first extract our novel “weighted accumulated self-attention map” along with cross-attention map from the SD prior. Then, using these extracted maps, the text embeddings of SD are optimized to highlight the segmented region in these attention maps, which in turn can be used to derive new segmentation results. Moreover, leveraging additional training data when available, i.e. few-shot, improves the performance of SLiMe. We performed comprehensive experiments examining various design factors and showed that SLiMe outperforms other existing one-shot and few-shot segmentation methods.
Aliasghar Khani, Saeid Asgari Taghanaki, Aditya Sanghi, Ali Mahdavi-Amiri, Ghassan Hamarneh
ICLR1
2023 PAIP 2020: Microsatellite instability prediction in colorectal cancer
abstract
Microsatellite instability (MSI) refers to alterations in the length of simple repetitive genomic sequences. MSI status serves as a prognostic and predictive factor in colorectal cancer. The MSI-high status is a good prognostic factor in stage II/III cancer, and predicts a lack of benefit to adjuvant fluorouracil chemotherapy in stage II cancer but a good response to immunotherapy in stage IV cancer. Therefore, determining MSI status in patients with colorectal cancer is important for identifying the appropriate treatment protocol. In the Pathology Artificial Intelligence Platform (PAIP) 2020 challenge, artificial intelligence researchers were invited to predict MSI status based on colorectal cancer slide images. Participants were required to perform two tasks. The primary task was to classify a given slide image as belonging to either the MSI-high or the microsatellite-stable group. The second task was tumor area segmentation to avoid ties with the main task. A total of 210 of the 495 participants enrolled in the challenge downloaded the images, and 23 teams submitted their final results. Seven teams from the top 10 participants agreed to disclose their algorithms, most of which were convolutional neural network-based deep learning models, such as EfficientNet and UNet. The top-ranked system achieved the highest F1 score (0.9231). This paper summarizes the various methods used in the PAIP 2020 challenge. This paper supports the effectiveness of digital pathology for identifying the relationship between colorectal cancer and the MSI characteristics.
Kyungmo Kim, Kyoungbun Lee, Sungduk Cho, Dong Un Kang, Seongkeun Park, Yunsook Kang, Hyunjeong Kim, Gheeyoung Choe, Kyung Chul Moon, Kyu Sang Lee, Jeong Hwan Park, Choyeon Hong, Ramin Nateghi, Fattaneh Pourakpour, Sen Yang 0006, Seyed Alireza Fatemi Jahromi, Aliasghar Khani, Hwa-Rang Kim, Doo-Hyun Choi, Jin Tae Kwak, David Joon Ho, Gyeong Hoon Kang, Se Young Chun, Won-Ki Jeong, Peom Park, Jinwook Choi
Medical Image Anal.18
2022 MaskTune: Mitigating Spurious Correlations by Forcing to Explore
abstract
A fundamental challenge of over-parameterized deep learning models is learning meaningful data representations that yield good performance on a downstream task without over-fitting spurious input features. This work proposes MaskTune, a masking strategy that prevents over-reliance on spurious (or a limited number of) features. MaskTune forces the trained model to explore new features during a single epoch finetuning by masking previously discovered features. MaskTune, unlike earlier approaches for mitigating shortcut learning, does not require any supervision, such as annotating spurious features or labels for subgroup samples in a dataset. Our empirical results on biased MNIST, CelebA, Waterbirds, and ImagenNet-9L datasets show that MaskTune is effective on tasks that often suffer from the existence of spurious correlations. Finally, we show that \method{} outperforms or achieves similar performance to the competing methods when applied to the selective classification (classification with rejection option) task. Code for MaskTune is available at https://github.com/aliasgharkhani/Masktune.
Saeid Asgari Taghanaki, Aliasghar Khani, Fereshte Khani, Ali Mahdavi-Amiri, Ghassan Hamarneh
NeurIPS2
2021 MoNuSAC2020: A Multi-Organ Nuclei Segmentation and Classification Challenge
abstract
Detecting various types of cells in and around the tumor matrix holds a special significance in characterizing the tumor micro-environment for cancer prognostication and research. Automating the tasks of detecting, segmenting, and classifying nuclei can free up the pathologists' time for higher value tasks and reduce errors due to fatigue and subjectivity. To encourage the computer vision research community to develop and test algorithms for these tasks, we prepared a large and diverse dataset of nucleus boundary annotations and class labels. The dataset has over 46,000 nuclei from 37 hospitals, 71 patients, four organs, and four nucleus types. We also organized a challenge around this dataset as a satellite event at the International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI) in April 2020. The challenge saw a wide participation from across the world, and the top methods were able to match inter-human concordance for the challenge metric. In this paper, we summarize the dataset and the key findings of the challenge, including the commonalities and differences between the methods developed by various participants. We have released the MoNuSAC2020 dataset to the public.
Ruchika Verma, Neeraj Kumar 0002, Abhijeet Patil, Nikhil Cherian Kurian, Swapnil Rane, Simon Graham, Quoc Dang Vu, Mieke Zwager, Shan E Ahmed Raza, Nasir M. Rajpoot, Xiyi Wu, Huai Chen, Lisheng Wang, Hyun Jung, G. Thomas Brown, Shuolin Liu, Seyed Alireza Fatemi Jahromi, Aliasghar Khani, Ehsan Montahaei, Mahdieh Soleymani Baghshah, Hamid Behroozi, Pavel Semkin, Alexandr Rassadin, Prasad Dutande, Romil Lodaya, Ujjwal Baid, Bhakti Baheti, Sanjay N. Talbar, Amirreza Mahbod, Rupert Ecker, Isabella Ellinger, Bin Dong 0006, Zhengyu Xu, Yuehan Yao, Ming Feng, Kele Xu, Hasib Zunair, A. Ben Hamza, Steven M. Smiley, Tang-Kai Yin, Qi-Rui Fang, Shikhar Srivastava 0001, Dwarikanath Mahapatra, Lubomira Trnavska, Hanyun Zhang, Priya Lakshmi Narayanan, Justin Law, Yinyin Yuan, Abhiroop Tejomay, Aditya Mitkari, Dinesh Koka, Vikas Ramachandra, Lata Kini, Amit Sethi
IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging20