Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matteo Pirola

dblp:323/8723 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 91% Learning theory · 9%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.612022
Stochastic Rising Bandits · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
non-stationary bandits
0.612022
Stochastic Rising Bandits · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization
0.612022
Stochastic Rising Bandits · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
online model selection
0.212022
Stochastic Rising Bandits · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regret analysis · 0.6UCB · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Stochastic Rising Bandits
abstract
This paper is in the field of stochastic Multi-Armed Bandits (MABs), i.e., those sequential selection techniques able to learn online using only the feedback given by the chosen option (a.k.a. arm). We study a particular case of the rested and restless bandits in which the arms’ expected payoff is monotonically non-decreasing. This characteristic allows designing specifically crafted algorithms that exploit the regularity of the payoffs to provide tight regret bounds. We design an algorithm for the rested case (R-ed-UCB) and one for the restless case (R-less-UCB), providing a regret bound depending on the properties of the instance and, under certain circumstances, of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{\frac{2}{3}})$. We empirically compare our algorithms with state-of-the-art methods for non-stationary MABs over several synthetically generated tasks and an online model selection problem for a real-world dataset. Finally, using synthetic and real-world data, we illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches compared with state-of-the-art algorithms for the non-stationary bandits.
Alberto Maria Metelli, Francesco Trovò, Matteo Pirola, Marcello Restelli
ICML3