Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matteo Pirola
dblp:323/8723
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 91% Learning theory · 9% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Stochastic Rising Bandits · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-armed bandit
non-stationary bandits |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Stochastic Rising Bandits · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
regret minimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Stochastic Rising Bandits · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › online learning
online model selection |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Stochastic Rising Bandits · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
regret analysis · 0.6UCB · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Stochastic Rising BanditsabstractThis paper is in the field of stochastic Multi-Armed Bandits (MABs), i.e., those sequential selection techniques able to learn online using only the feedback given by the chosen option (a.k.a. arm). We study a particular case of the rested and restless bandits in which the arms’ expected payoff is monotonically non-decreasing. This characteristic allows designing specifically crafted algorithms that exploit the regularity of the payoffs to provide tight regret bounds. We design an algorithm for the rested case (R-ed-UCB) and one for the restless case (R-less-UCB), providing a regret bound depending on the properties of the instance and, under certain circumstances, of $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(T^{\frac{2}{3}})$. We empirically compare our algorithms with state-of-the-art methods for non-stationary MABs over several synthetically generated tasks and an online model selection problem for a real-world dataset. Finally, using synthetic and real-world data, we illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approaches compared with state-of-the-art algorithms for the non-stationary bandits. Alberto Maria Metelli, Francesco Trovò, Matteo Pirola, Marcello Restelli |
ICML | 3 |