The emergence of large language models (LLMs) has opened new opportunities for AI-driven chemical problem solving. However, existing chemical LLMs are typically tailored to specific task formats or narrow domains, limiting their capacity to integrate knowledge and generalize across tasks. Model merging offers a promising route for efficiently combining specialized LLMs into a unified model without access to original training data, which is urgently needed in the chemical domain where in-house data and privacy preservation are critical. However, effective model merging in the chemical domain poses unique challenges: (1) significant disparities among chemical LLMs due to task-specific specialization, and (2) a highly imbalanced distribution of chemical LLMs in targeted downstream tasks, where some are over-benchmarked while others remain underexplored. These challenges intensify model inconsistencies such as parameter interference and accumulated fine-tuning noise, which collectively hinder effective model merging. To this end, we propose Curriculum Model Merging (CMM), a curriculum-based framework that progressively merges expert chemical LLMs in a moderate and continual manner. CMM aims to harmonize their inconsistencies while meantime preserve their domain-specific expertise. Comprehensive experiments on two benchmark datasets show that CMM effectively consolidates task-specific expertise and outperforms the state-of-the-art methods by 29.03\% in terms of overall average performance. Moreover, CMM facilitates chemical knowledge generalization across prediction and generative tasks without sacrificing robustness, exhibiting promising merging performance under both expert-abundant and expert-sparse scenarios.

Machine learning-assisted retrosynthesis prediction models have been gaining widespread adoption, though their performances oftentimes degrade significantly when deployed in real-world applications embracing out-of-distribution (OOD) molecules or reactions. Despite steady progress on standard benchmarks, our understanding of existing retrosynthesis prediction models under the premise of distribution shifts remains stagnant. To this end, we first formally sort out two types of distribution shifts in retrosynthesis prediction and construct two groups of benchmark datasets. Next, through comprehensive experiments, we systematically compare state-of-the-art retrosynthesis prediction models on the two groups of benchmarks, revealing the limitations of previous in-distribution evaluation and re-examining the advantages of each model. More remarkably, we are motivated by the above empirical insights to propose two model-agnostic techniques that can improve the OOD generalization of arbitrary off-the-shelf retrosynthesis prediction algorithms. Our preliminary experiments show their high potential with an average performance improvement of 4.6%, and the established benchmarks serve as a foothold for further retrosynthesis prediction research towards OOD generalization.

Retrosynthetic planning is a sequential decision-making process of identifying synthetic routes from the available building block materials to reach a desired target molecule. Though existing planning approaches show promisingly high solving rates and low costs, the trivial route cost evaluation via pre-trained forward reaction prediction models certainly falls short of real-world chemical practice. An alternative option is to annotate the actual cost of a route, such as yield, through chemical experiments or input from chemists, while this often leads to substantial query costs. In order to strike the balance between query costs and route quality evaluation, we propose an Active Retrosynthetic Planning (ARP) framework that remains compatible with the established retrosynthetic planners. On one hand, the proposed ARP trains an actor that decides whether to query the cost of a reaction; on the other hand, it resorts to a critic to estimate the value of a molecule with its preceding reaction cost as input. Those molecules with low reaction costs are preferred to expand first. We apply our framework to different existing approaches on both the benchmark and an expert dataset and demonstrate that it outperforms the existing state-of-the-art approach by 6.2\% in route quality while reducing the query cost by 12.8\%. In addition, ARP consistently plans high-quality routes with either abundant or sparse annotations.

Meta-learning has emerged as a potent paradigm for quick learning of few-shot tasks, by leveraging the meta-knowledge learned from meta-training tasks. Well-generalized meta-knowledge that facilitates fast adaptation in each task is preferred; however, recent evidence suggests the undesirable memorization effect where the meta-knowledge simply memorizing all meta-training tasks discourages task-specific adaptation and poorly generalizes. There have been several solutions to mitigating the effect, including both regularizer-based and augmentation-based methods, while a systematic understanding of these methods in a single framework is still lacking. In this paper, we offer a novel causal perspective of meta-learning. Through the lens of causality, we conclude the universal label space as a confounder to be the causing factor of memorization and frame the two lines of prevailing methods as different deconfounder approaches. Remarkably, derived from the causal inference principle of front-door adjustment, we propose two frustratingly easy but effective deconfounder algorithms, i.e., sampling multiple versions of the meta-knowledge via Dropout and grouping the meta-knowledge into multiple bins. The proposed causal perspective not only brings in the two deconfounder algorithms that surpass previous works in four benchmark datasets towards combating memorization, but also opens a promising direction for meta-learning.