Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jason Q. Xu
dblp:323/9568
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0001-5472-3720ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Data mining · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Learning theory · 71% Optimization for machine learning · 29% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
clustering |
1.7 | 3 | 2023 | Implicit Annealing in Kernel Spaces: A Strongly Consistent Clustering Approach · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 Bregman Power k-Means for Clustering Exponential Family Data · ICML 2022 Uniform Concentration Bounds toward a Unified Framework for Robust Clustering · NeurIPS 2021 |
Data mining › clustering
center-based clustering |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Bregman Power k-Means for Clustering Exponential Family Data · ICML 2022 Uniform Concentration Bounds toward a Unified Framework for Robust Clustering · NeurIPS 2021 |
Data mining › clustering
k-means clustering |
1.1 | 2 | 2022 | Bregman Power k-Means for Clustering Exponential Family Data · ICML 2022 Uniform Concentration Bounds toward a Unified Framework for Robust Clustering · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › statistical consistency
strong consistency |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Implicit Annealing in Kernel Spaces: A Strongly Consistent Clustering Approach · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Data mining › clustering › kernel clustering
kernel k-means |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Implicit Annealing in Kernel Spaces: A Strongly Consistent Clustering Approach · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Data mining › clustering › center-based clustering
bregman divergence clustering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Bregman Power k-Means for Clustering Exponential Family Data · ICML 2022 |
Data mining › clustering
robust clustering |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Uniform Concentration Bounds toward a Unified Framework for Robust Clustering · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › non-convex optimization
majorization-minimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Implicit Annealing in Kernel Spaces: A Strongly Consistent Clustering Approach · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | Implicit Annealing in Kernel Spaces: A Strongly Consistent Clustering Approach · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
concentration inequalities |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Uniform Concentration Bounds toward a Unified Framework for Robust Clustering · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical learning theory |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Uniform Concentration Bounds toward a Unified Framework for Robust Clustering · NeurIPS 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
majorization-minimization · 1.3kernel power k-means · 1.3annealing · 1.3median-of-means estimation · 1.0dudley's chaining · 1.0finite sample bounds · 0.6bregman divergence · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Implicit Annealing in Kernel Spaces: A Strongly Consistent Clustering ApproachabstractKernel k-means clustering is a powerful tool for unsupervised learning of non-linearly separable data. Its merits are thoroughly validated on a suite of simulated datasets and real data benchmarks that feature nonlinear and multi-view separation. Since the earliest attempts, researchers have noted that such algorithms often become trapped by local minima arising from the non-convexity of the underlying objective function. In this paper, we generalize recent results leveraging a general family of means to combat sub-optimal local solutions to the kernel and multi-kernel settings. Called Kernel Power k-Means, our algorithm uses majorization-minimization (MM) to better solve this non-convex problem. We show that the method implicitly performs annealing in kernel feature space while retaining efficient, closed-form updates. We rigorously characterize its convergence properties both from computational and statistical points of view. In particular, we characterize the large sample behavior of the proposed method by establishing strong consistency guarantees as well as finite-sample bounds on the excess risk of the estimates through modern tools in learning theory. The proposal's efficacy is demonstrated through an array of simulated and real data experiments. Debolina Paul, Saptarshi Chakraborty, Swagatam Das, Jason Q. Xu |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 4 |
| 2022 | Bregman Power k-Means for Clustering Exponential Family DataabstractRecent progress in center-based clustering algorithms combats poor local minima by implicit annealing through a family of generalized means. These methods are variations of Lloyd’s celebrated k-means algorithm, and are most appropriate for spherical clusters such as those arising from Gaussian data. In this paper, we bridge these new algorithmic advances to classical work on hard clustering under Bregman divergences, which enjoy a bijection to exponential family distributions and are thus well-suited for clustering objects arising from a breadth of data generating mechanisms. The elegant properties of Bregman divergences allow us to maintain closed form updates in a simple and transparent algorithm, and moreover lead to new theoretical arguments for establishing finite sample bounds that relax the bounded support assumption made in the existing state of the art. Additionally, we consider thorough empirical analyses on simulated experiments and a case study on rainfall data, finding that the proposed method outperforms existing peer methods in a variety of non-Gaussian data settings. Adithya Vellal, Saptarshi Chakraborty, Jason Q. Xu |
ICML | 3 |
| 2021 | Uniform Concentration Bounds toward a Unified Framework for Robust ClusteringabstractRecent advances in center-based clustering continue to improve upon the drawbacks of Lloyd's celebrated $k$-means algorithm over $60$ years after its introduction. Various methods seek to address poor local minima, sensitivity to outliers, and data that are not well-suited to Euclidean measures of fit, but many are supported largely empirically. Moreover, combining such approaches in a piecemeal manner can result in ad hoc methods, and the limited theoretical results supporting each individual contribution may no longer hold. Toward addressing these issues in a principled way, this paper proposes a cohesive robust framework for center-based clustering under a general class of dissimilarity measures. In particular, we present a rigorous theoretical treatment within a Median-of-Means (MoM) estimation framework, showing that it subsumes several popular $k$-means variants. In addition to unifying existing methods, we derive uniform concentration bounds that complete their analyses, and bridge these results to the MoM framework via Dudley's chaining arguments. Importantly, we neither require any assumptions on the distribution of the outlying observations nor on the relative number of observations $n$ to features $p$. We establish strong consistency and an error rate of $O(n^{-1/2})$ under mild conditions, surpassing the best-known results in the literature. The methods are empirically validated thoroughly on real and synthetic datasets. Debolina Paul, Saptarshi Chakraborty, Swagatam Das, Jason Q. Xu |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2020 | Entropy Weighted Power k-Means ClusteringabstractDespite its well-known shortcomings, k-means remains one of the most widely used approaches to data clustering. Current research continues to tackle its flaws while attempting to preserve its simplicity. Recently, the power k-means algorithm was proposed to avoid poor local minima by annealing through a family of smoother surfaces. However, the approach lacks statistical guarantees and fails in high dimensions when many features are irrelevant. This paper addresses these issues by introducing entropy regularization to learn feature relevance while annealing. We prove consistency of the proposed approach and derive a scalable majorization-minimization algorithm that enjoys closed-form updates and convergence guarantees. In particular, our method retains the same computational complexity of k-means and power k-means, but yields significant improvements over both. Its merits are thoroughly assessed on a suite of real and synthetic data. Saptarshi Chakraborty, Debolina Paul, Swagatam Das, Jason Q. Xu |
AISTATS | 4 |