Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Fabricio Vasselai
dblp:324/0466
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Multi-agent systems · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice › strategic voting
iterative voting |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Iterative Calculus of Voting under Plurality · AAAI 2022 |
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › social choice
voting |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Iterative Calculus of Voting under Plurality · AAAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
simulation · 1.1pivotal probability computation · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Iterative Calculus of Voting under PluralityabstractWe formalize a voting model for plurality elections that combines Iterative Voting and Calculus of Voting. Each iteration, autonomous agents simultaneously maximize the utility they expect from candidates. Agents are aware of neither other individuals’ preferences or choices, nor of the distribution of preferences. They know only of candidates’ latest vote shares and with that calculate expected rewards from each candidate, pondering the probability that voting for each would alter the election. We define the general form of those pivotal probabilities, then we derive efficient exact and approximated calculations. Lastly, we prove formally the model converges with asymptotically large electorates and show via simulations that it nearly always converges even with very few agents. Fabricio Vasselai |
AAAI | 1 |