EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Florian Pollitt
dblp:324/1552
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0001-4337-6919ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Theory of computation · 6 · 3 first-author · 6 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Factoring Learned ClausesabstractModern SAT solvers are based on the conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) paradigm, which can be simulated by the resolution proof system. This limits solver effectiveness on instances known to be hard for resolution. Certain approaches, such as parity reasoning, have been shown to be effective in this context, but are hard to integrate with CDCL, in particular, with mainstream proof certificates. The powerful yet simple Extended Resolution (ER) proof system provides an alternative but is not widely used in SAT solving despite having proof certificates for decades and using it effectively remains an open challenge. This paper revisits previous work on ER, which factors out repeated parts of learned clauses during conflict analysis, and explores how their original strategy benefits from 15 years of improvements in the state-of-the-art solver CaDiCaL. We further propose a new, less intrusive inprocessing approach based on factoring XOR and ITE gates from learned clauses globally. Previous work on bounded variable addition focused on AND gates and original clauses only. Our experimental evaluation shows substantial improvements on hard combinatorial benchmark families without performance degradation on the SAT Competition. Florian Pollitt, Zachary Battleman, Mathias Fleury, Yakir Vizel, Marijn Heule, Armin Biere, Randal E. Bryant |
SAT | 1 |
| 2026 | CaDiCaL 3.0 (Tool Paper)abstractThe propositional satisfiability (SAT) solver Kissat supports a relatively narrow feature set in favor of bare-metal performance and targeted improvements to core solving techniques, which helped it dominate the International SAT Competition since 2024. However, many applications rely on advanced SAT solver features such as incremental interaction schemes, finding direct consequences of assumed literals, or expressive proof logging that allows for real-time checking. This system description reports on how we successfully adapted Kissat’s award-winning techniques to the full-featured incremental SAT solver CaDiCaL, including clausal congruence closure, clausal equivalence sweeping, and bounded variable addition. The main challenge was to support efficient linear proof production with hints. We further extended CaDiCaL’s API to extract implied literals under assumptions and applied advanced deterministic scheduling of inprocessing based on the ticks metric for approximating cache line accesses. Experiments confirm the benefits of these efforts. Florian Pollitt, Mathias Fleury, Katalin Fazekas, Nils Christian Froleyks, André Schidler, Dominik Schreiber 0001, Armin Biere |
SAT | 1 |
| 2025 | Learn to Unlearn
Bernhard Gstrein, Florian Pollitt, André Schidler, Mathias Fleury, Armin Biere |
SAT | 2 |
| 2024 | CaDiCaL 2.0abstractAbstract The SAT solver CaDiCaL provides a rich feature set with a clean library interface. It has been adopted by many users, is well documented and easy to extend due to its effective testing and debugging infrastructure. In this tool paper we give a high-level introduction into the solver architecture and then go briefly over implemented techniques. We describe basic features and novel advanced usage scenarios. Experiments confirm that CaDiCaL despite this flexibility has state-of-the-art performance both in a stand-alone as well as incremental setting. Armin Biere, Tobias Faller, Katalin Fazekas, Mathias Fleury, Nils Christian Froleyks, Florian Pollitt |
CAV (1) | 6 |
| 2024 | Certifying Incremental SAT SolvingabstractCertifying results by checking proofs and models is an essential feature of modern SAT solving. While incremental solving with assumptions and core extraction is crucial for many applications, support for incremental proof certificates remains lacking. We propose a proof format and corresponding checkers for incremental SAT solving. We further extend it to leverage resolution hints. Experiments on incremental SAT solving for Bounded Model Checking and Satisfiability Modulo Theories demonstrate the feasibility of our approach, further confirming that resolution hints substantially reduce checking time. Katalin Fazekas, Florian Pollitt, Mathias Fleury, Armin Biere |
LPAR | 2 |
| 2023 | Faster LRAT Checking Than Solving with CaDiCaL
Florian Pollitt, Mathias Fleury, Armin Biere |
SAT | 1 |
| 2022 | Making Translations to Classical Planning Competitive with Other HTN PlannersabstractTranslation-based approaches to planning allow for solving problems in complex and expressive formalisms via the means of highly efficient solvers for simpler formalisms. To be effective, these translations have to be constructed appropriately. The current existing translation of the highly expressive formalism of HTN planning into the more simple formalism of classical planning is not on par with the performance of current dedicated HTN planners. With our contributions in this paper, we close this gap: we describe new versions of the translation that reach the performance of state-of-the-art dedicated HTN planners. We present new translation techniques both for the special case of totally-ordered HTNs as well as for the general partially-ordered case. In the latter, we show that our new translation generates only linearly many actions, while the previous encoding generates and exponential number of actions. Gregor Behnke, Florian Pollitt, Daniel Höller, Pascal Bercher, Ron Alford |
AAAI | 2 |