EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Mathieu Lhotel
dblp:324/1660
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Coding theory · 55% Computational complexity · 30% Logic in computer science · 15% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
algebraic geometry code |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Goppa-Like AG Codes From Ca,b Curves and Their Behavior Under Squaring Their Dual · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 Interactive Oracle Proofs of Proximity to Algebraic Geometry Codes · CCC 2022 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography
code-based cryptography |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Goppa-Like AG Codes From Ca,b Curves and Their Behavior Under Squaring Their Dual · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › post-quantum cryptography › code-based cryptography
mceliece cryptosystem |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Goppa-Like AG Codes From Ca,b Curves and Their Behavior Under Squaring Their Dual · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
post-quantum cryptography |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Goppa-Like AG Codes From Ca,b Curves and Their Behavior Under Squaring Their Dual · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Computational complexity › property testing › distribution testing
closeness testing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interactive Oracle Proofs of Proximity to Algebraic Geometry Codes · CCC 2022 |
Logic in computer science › proof systems
interactive oracle proofs |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interactive Oracle Proofs of Proximity to Algebraic Geometry Codes · CCC 2022 |
Computational complexity
interactive oracle proof of proximity |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interactive Oracle Proofs of Proximity to Algebraic Geometry Codes · CCC 2022 |
Coding theory › error-correcting codes
reed-solomon codes |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Interactive Oracle Proofs of Proximity to Algebraic Geometry Codes · CCC 2022 |
Coding theory
code-based cryptography |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Goppa-Like AG Codes From Ca,b Curves and Their Behavior Under Squaring Their Dual · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
dual code squaring · 1.5dimension analysis · 1.5riemann-roch space decomposition · 0.6kummer curves · 0.6hermitian tower · 0.6group action · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Goppa-Like AG Codes From Ca,b Curves and Their Behavior Under Squaring Their DualabstractIn this paper, we introduce a family of codes that can be used in a McEliece cryptosystem, called Goppa-like AG codes. These codes generalize classical Goppa codes and can be constructed from any curve of genus$\mathfrak {g} \geq 0$. Focusing on codes from$C_{a,b}$curves, we study the behaviour of the dimension of the square of their dual to determine their resistance to distinguisher attacks similar to the one for alternant and Goppa codes developed by Mora and Tillich (2023). We also propose numerical experiments to measure the sharpness of our bound. Sabira El Khalfaoui, Mathieu Lhotel, Jade Nardi |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 2 |
| 2022 | Interactive Oracle Proofs of Proximity to Algebraic Geometry CodesabstractIn this work, we initiate the study of proximity testing to Algebraic Geometry (AG) codes. An AG code $C = C(\mathcal{X}, \mathcal{P}, D)$ over an algebraic curve $\mathcal{X}$ is a vector space associated to evaluations on $\mathcal{P}$ of functions in the Riemann-Roch space $L_\mathcal{X}(D)$. The problem of testing proximity to an error-correcting code $C$ consists in distinguishing between the case where an input word, given as an oracle, belongs to $C$ and the one where it is far from every codeword of $C$. AG codes are good candidates to construct short proof systems, but there exists no efficient proximity tests for them. We aim to fill this gap. We construct an Interactive Oracle Proof of Proximity (IOPP) for some families of AG codes by generalizing an IOPP for Reed-Solomon codes introduced by Ben-Sasson, Bentov, Horesh and Riabzev, known as the FRI protocol. We identify suitable requirements for designing efficient IOPP systems for AG codes. Our approach relies on a neat decomposition of the Riemann-Roch space of any invariant divisor under a group action on a curve into several explicit Riemann-Roch spaces on the quotient curve. We provide sufficient conditions on an AG code $C$ that allow to reduce a proximity testing problem for $C$ to a membership problem for a significantly smaller code $C'$. As concrete instantiations, we study AG codes on Kummer curves and curves in the Hermitian tower. The latter can be defined over polylogarithmic-size alphabet. We specialize the generic AG-IOPP construction to reach linear prover running time and logarithmic verification on Kummer curves, and quasilinear prover time with polylogarithmic verification on the Hermitian tower. Sarah Bordage, Mathieu Lhotel, Jade Nardi, Hugues Randriambololona |
CCC | 2 |