Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Zhiyuan Cheng 0010

dblp:324/1963 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
5as first author
9since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-7280-6079ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 5 first-author · 6 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
3D vision · 56% Trustworthy machine learning · 37% Autonomous driving · 5%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Debugging and program repair · 50% Software testing · 25% Software maintenance and evolution · 25%
Network and information security
4 papers
Security and privacy of machine learning · 58% Digital forensics and information hiding · 21% Cyber-physical and IoT security · 21%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Database system architecture and tuning · 87% Machine learning and data management · 13%

Topics — the 23 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
2.232024
Self-Supervised Adversarial Training of Monocular Depth Estimation Against Physical-World Attacks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024
Fusion Is Not Enough: Single Modal Attacks on Fusion Models for 3D Object Detection · ICLR 2024
Adversarial Training of Self-supervised Monocular Depth Estimation against Physical-World Attacks · ICLR 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation
monocular depth estimation
2.132024
Self-Supervised Adversarial Training of Monocular Depth Estimation Against Physical-World Attacks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024
BadPart: Unified Black-box Adversarial Patch Attacks against Pixel-wise Regression Tasks · ICML 2024
Physical Attack on Monocular Depth Estimation with Optimal Adversarial Patches · ECCV (38) 2022
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack › physical adversarial attack
adversarial patch
1.322024
BadPart: Unified Black-box Adversarial Patch Attacks against Pixel-wise Regression Tasks · ICML 2024
Physical Attack on Monocular Depth Estimation with Optimal Adversarial Patches · ECCV (38) 2022
Computer vision › 3D vision
3d object detection
0.812024
Fusion Is Not Enough: Single Modal Attacks on Fusion Models for 3D Object Detection · ICLR 2024
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d object detection › multimodal 3d object detection
camera-LiDAR fusion 3D object detection
0.812024
Fusion Is Not Enough: Single Modal Attacks on Fusion Models for 3D Object Detection · ICLR 2024
Database system architecture and tuning › configuration tuning
automatic configuration tuning
0.812024
GPTuner: A Manual-Reading Database Tuning System via GPT-Guided Bayesian Optimization · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Database system architecture and tuning › configuration tuning
knob tuning
0.812024
GPTuner: A Manual-Reading Database Tuning System via GPT-Guided Bayesian Optimization · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Software testing › system testing › cyber-physical system testing
autonomous driving system testing
0.812024
ROCAS: Root Cause Analysis of Autonomous Driving Accidents via Cyber-Physical Co-mutation · ASE 2024
Debugging and program repair
fault localization
0.812024
ROCAS: Root Cause Analysis of Autonomous Driving Accidents via Cyber-Physical Co-mutation · ASE 2024
Software maintenance and evolution › software configuration
misconfiguration detection
0.812024
ROCAS: Root Cause Analysis of Autonomous Driving Accidents via Cyber-Physical Co-mutation · ASE 2024
Debugging and program repair
root cause analysis
0.812024
ROCAS: Root Cause Analysis of Autonomous Driving Accidents via Cyber-Physical Co-mutation · ASE 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training
0.712023
Adversarial Training of Self-supervised Monocular Depth Estimation against Physical-World Attacks · ICLR 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision
depth estimation
0.712023
Adversarial Training of Self-supervised Monocular Depth Estimation against Physical-World Attacks · ICLR 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision › depth estimation › self-supervised depth estimation
self-supervised monocular depth estimation
0.712023
Adversarial Training of Self-supervised Monocular Depth Estimation against Physical-World Attacks · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial attack
0.612022
Physical Attack on Monocular Depth Estimation with Optimal Adversarial Patches · ECCV (38) 2022
Cyber-physical and IoT security
automotive security
0.612022
RVPLAYER: Robotic Vehicle Forensics by Replay with What-if Reasoning · NDSS 2022
Digital forensics and information hiding
digital forensics
0.612022
RVPLAYER: Robotic Vehicle Forensics by Replay with What-if Reasoning · NDSS 2022
Robotics › Autonomous driving
perception
0.422024
Fusion Is Not Enough: Single Modal Attacks on Fusion Models for 3D Object Detection · ICLR 2024
Adversarial Training of Self-supervised Monocular Depth Estimation against Physical-World Attacks · ICLR 2023
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow
0.212024
BadPart: Unified Black-box Adversarial Patch Attacks against Pixel-wise Regression Tasks · ICML 2024
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
sensor fusion
0.212024
Fusion Is Not Enough: Single Modal Attacks on Fusion Models for 3D Object Detection · ICLR 2024
Machine learning and data management
learned database components
0.212024
GPTuner: A Manual-Reading Database Tuning System via GPT-Guided Bayesian Optimization · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
physical adversarial attack
0.212024
Self-Supervised Adversarial Training of Monocular Depth Estimation Against Physical-World Attacks · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2024
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical systems
0.212024
ROCAS: Root Cause Analysis of Autonomous Driving Accidents via Cyber-Physical Co-mutation · ASE 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

view synthesis · 1.5self-supervised adversarial training · 1.5score-based gradient estimation · 1.5probabilistic square sampling · 1.5mutation testing · 1.5l0-norm-bounded perturbation · 1.5differential analysis · 1.5black-box query-based attack · 1.5two-stage optimization · 0.8prompt ensemble · 0.8large language model · 0.8bayesian optimization · 0.8adversarial patch · 0.8self-supervised learning · 0.7adversarial training · 0.7what-if reasoning · 0.6replay · 0.6adversarial patch optimization · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 EffiTune: Diagnosing and Mitigating Training Inefficiency for Parameter Tuner in Robot Navigation System
abstract
Robot navigation systems are critical for various real-world applications such as delivery services, hospital logistics, and warehouse management. Although classical navigation methods provide interpretability, they rely heavily on expert manual tuning, limiting their adaptability. Conversely, purely learning-based methods offer adaptability but often lead to instability and erratic robot behaviors. Recently introduced parameter tuners aim to balance these approaches by integrating data-driven adaptability into classical navigation frameworks. However, the parameter tuning process currently suffers from training inefficiencies and redundant sampling, with critical regions in environment often underrepresented in training data.In this paper, we propose EffiTune, a novel framework designed to diagnose and mitigate training inefficiency for parameter tuners in robot navigation systems. EffiTune first performs robot-behavior-guided diagnostics to pinpoint critical bottlenecks and underrepresented regions. It then employs a targeted up-sampling strategy to enrich the training dataset with critical samples, significantly reducing redundancy and enhancing training efficiency. Our comprehensive evaluation demonstrates that EffiTune achieves more than a 13.5% improvement in navigation performance, enhanced robustness in out-of-distribution scenarios, and a 4× improvement in training efficiency within the same computational budget.
Shiwei Feng 0002, Xuan Chen 0003, Zikang Xiong, Zhiyuan Cheng 0010, Siyuan Cheng 0005, Sayali Kate, Xiangyu Zhang 0001
IROS4
2024 Fusion Is Not Enough: Single Modal Attacks on Fusion Models for 3D Object Detection
abstract
Multi-sensor fusion (MSF) is widely used in autonomous vehicles (AVs) for perception, particularly for 3D object detection with camera and LiDAR sensors. The purpose of fusion is to capitalize on the advantages of each modality while minimizing its weaknesses. Advanced deep neural network (DNN)-based fusion techniques have demonstrated the exceptional and industry-leading performance. Due to the redundant information in multiple modalities, MSF is also recognized as a general defence strategy against adversarial attacks. In this paper, we attack fusion models from the camera modality that is considered to be of lesser importance in fusion but is more affordable for attackers. We argue that the weakest link of fusion models depends on their most vulnerable modality and propose an attack framework that targets advanced camera-LiDAR fusion-based 3D object detection models through camera-only adversarial attacks. Our approach employs a two-stage optimization-based strategy that first thoroughly evaluates vulnerable image areas under adversarial attacks, and then applies dedicated attack strategies for different fusion models to generate deployable patches. The evaluations with six advanced camera-LiDAR fusion models and one camera-only model indicate that our attacks successfully compromise all of them. Our approach can either decrease the mean average precision (mAP) of detection performance from 0.824 to 0.353 or degrade the detection score of a target object from 0.728 to 0.156, demonstrating the efficacy of our proposed attack framework. Code is available.
Zhiyuan Cheng 0010, Hongjun Choi, Shiwei Feng 0002, James Liang, Guanhong Tao 0001, Dongfang Liu, Michael Zuzak, Xiangyu Zhang 0001
ICLR1
2024 BadPart: Unified Black-box Adversarial Patch Attacks against Pixel-wise Regression Tasks
abstract
Pixel-wise regression tasks (e.g., monocular depth estimation (MDE) and optical flow estimation (OFE)) have been widely involved in our daily life in applications like autonomous driving, augmented reality and video composition. Although certain applications are security-critical or bear societal significance, the adversarial robustness of such models are not sufficiently studied, especially in the black-box scenario. In this work, we introduce the first unified black-box adversarial patch attack framework against pixel-wise regression tasks, aiming to identify the vulnerabilities of these models under query-based black-box attacks. We propose a novel square-based adversarial patch optimization framework and employ probabilistic square sampling and score-based gradient estimation techniques to generate the patch effectively and efficiently, overcoming the scalability problem of previous black-box patch attacks. Our attack prototype, named BadPart, is evaluated on both MDE and OFE tasks, utilizing a total of 7 models. BadPart surpasses 3 baseline methods in terms of both attack performance and efficiency. We also apply BadPart on the Google online service for portrait depth estimation, causing 43.5% relative distance error with 50K queries. State-of-the-art (SOTA) countermeasures cannot defend our attack effectively.
Zhiyuan Cheng 0010, Tengda Guo, Shiwei Feng 0002, Dongfang Liu, MingJie Tang, Xiangyu Zhang 0001
ICML1
2024 ROCAS: Root Cause Analysis of Autonomous Driving Accidents via Cyber-Physical Co-mutation
abstract
As Autonomous driving systems (ADS) have transformed our daily life, safety of ADS is of growing significance. While various testing approaches have emerged to enhance the ADS reliability, a crucial gap remains in understanding the accidents causes. Such post-accident analysis is paramount and beneficial for enhancing ADS safety and reliability. Existing cyber-physical system (CPS) root cause analysis techniques are mainly designed for drones and cannot handle the unique challenges introduced by more complex physical environments and deep learning models deployed in ADS. In this paper, we address the gap by offering a formal definition of ADS root cause analysis problem and introducing Rocas, a novel ADS root cause analysis framework featuring cyber-physical co-mutation. Our technique uniquely leverages both physical and cyber mutation that can precisely identify the accident-trigger entity and pinpoint the misconfiguration of the target ADS responsible for an accident. We further design a differential analysis to identify the responsible module to reduce search space for the misconfiguration. We study 12 categories of ADS accidents and demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of Rocas in narrowing down search space and pinpointing the misconfiguration. We also show detailed case studies on how the identified misconfiguration helps understand rationale behind accidents.
Shiwei Feng 0002, Yapeng Ye, Qingkai Shi, Zhiyuan Cheng 0010, Xiangzhe Xu, Siyuan Cheng 0005, Hongjun Choi, Xiangyu Zhang 0001
ASE4
2024 Self-Supervised Adversarial Training of Monocular Depth Estimation Against Physical-World Attacks
abstract
Monocular Depth Estimation (MDE) plays a vital role in applications such as autonomous driving. However, various attacks target MDE models, with physical attacks posing significant threats to system security. Traditional adversarial training methods, which require ground-truth labels, are not directly applicable to MDE models that lack ground-truth depth. Some self-supervised model hardening techniques (e.g., contrastive learning) overlook the domain knowledge of MDE, resulting in suboptimal performance. In this work, we introduce a novel self-supervised adversarial training approach for MDE models, leveraging view synthesis without the need for ground-truth depth. We enhance adversarial robustness against real-world attacks by incorporating$L_{0}$-norm-bounded perturbation during training. We evaluate our method against supervised learning-based and contrastive learning-based approaches specifically designed for MDE. Our experiments with two representative MDE networks demonstrate improved robustness against various adversarial attacks, with minimal impact on benign performance.
Zhiyuan Cheng 0010, Cheng Han 0001, James Liang, Qifan Wang 0001, Xiangyu Zhang 0001, Dongfang Liu
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.1
2024 GPTuner: A Manual-Reading Database Tuning System via GPT-Guided Bayesian Optimization
abstract
Modern database management systems (DBMS) expose hundreds of configurable knobs to control system behaviours. Determining the appropriate values for these knobs to improve DBMS performance is a long-standing problem in the database community. As there is an increasing number of knobs to tune and each knob could be in continuous or categorical values, manual tuning becomes impractical. Recently, automatic tuning systems using machine learning methods have shown great potentials. However, existing approaches still incur significant tuning costs or only yield sub-optimal performance. This is because they either ignore the extensive domain knowledge available (e.g., DBMS manuals and forum discussions) and only rely on the runtime feedback of benchmark evaluations to guide the optimization, or they utilize the domain knowledge in a limited way. Hence, we propose GPTuner, a manual-reading database tuning system that leverages domain knowledge extensively and automatically to optimize search space and enhance the runtime feedback-based optimization process. Firstly, we develop a Large Language Model (LLM)-based pipeline to collect and refine heterogeneous knowledge, and propose a prompt ensemble algorithm to unify a structured view of the refined knowledge. Secondly, using the structured knowledge, we (1) design a workload-aware and training-free knob selection strategy, (2) develop a search space optimization technique considering the value range of each knob, and (3) propose a Coarse-to-Fine Bayesian Optimization Framework to explore the optimized space. Finally, we evaluate GPTuner under different benchmarks (TPC-C and TPC-H), metrics (throughput and latency) as well as DBMS (PostgreSQL and MySQL). Compared to the state-of-the-art approaches, GPTuner identifies better configurations in 16x less time on average. Moreover, GPTuner achieves up to 30% performance improvement (higher throughput or lower latency) over the best-performing alternative.
Jiale Lao, Yibo Wang 0015, Zhiyuan Cheng 0010, Wanghu Chen, MingJie Tang, Jianguo Wang 0001
Proc. VLDB Endow.6
2023 Adversarial Training of Self-supervised Monocular Depth Estimation against Physical-World Attacks
Zhiyuan Cheng 0010, James Liang, Guanhong Tao 0001, Dongfang Liu, Xiangyu Zhang 0001
ICLR1
2022 Physical Attack on Monocular Depth Estimation with Optimal Adversarial Patches
Zhiyuan Cheng 0010, James Liang, Hongjun Choi, Guanhong Tao 0001, Zhiwen Cao, Dongfang Liu, Xiangyu Zhang 0001
ECCV (38)1
2022 RVPLAYER: Robotic Vehicle Forensics by Replay with What-if Reasoning
Hongjun Choi, Zhiyuan Cheng 0010, Xiangyu Zhang 0001
NDSS2