Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Matthew Repasky

dblp:324/2968 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0007-0329-7515ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 41% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 24% Deep learning architectures and training · 21%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
consistency model
0.912025
Consistency Posterior Sampling for Diverse Image Synthesis · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model
0.912025
Consistency Posterior Sampling for Diverse Image Synthesis · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Generative modeling › image generation
diverse image synthesis
0.912025
Consistency Posterior Sampling for Diverse Image Synthesis · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
posterior sampling
0.912025
Consistency Posterior Sampling for Diverse Image Synthesis · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory
hypothesis testing
0.712023
Neural Stein Critics With Staged L 2-Regularization · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › regularization › norm-based regularization
l2 regularization
0.712023
Neural Stein Critics With Staged L 2-Regularization · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
regularization
0.712023
Neural Stein Critics With Staged L 2-Regularization · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › divergence measure
stein discrepancy
0.712023
Neural Stein Critics With Staged L 2-Regularization · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023
Image and video processing
image restoration
0.312025
Consistency Posterior Sampling for Diverse Image Synthesis · CVPR 2025
Machine learning › Learning theory › neural network theory › neural network kernels
neural tangent kernel
0.212023
Neural Stein Critics With Staged L 2-Regularization · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

noise-space sampling · 1.7langevin dynamics · 1.7stein discrepancy · 0.7neural tangent kernel · 0.7lazy training · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Consistency Posterior Sampling for Diverse Image Synthesis
abstract
Posterior sampling in high-dimensional spaces using generative models holds significant promise for various applications, including but not limited to inverse problems and guided generation tasks. Generating diverse posterior samples remains expensive, as existing methods require restarting the entire generative process for each new sample. In this work, we propose a posterior sampling approach that simulates Langevin dynamics in the noise space of a pre-trained generative model. By exploiting the mapping between the noise and data spaces which can be provided by distilled flows or consistency models, our method enables seamless exploration of the posterior without the need to re-run the full sampling chain, drastically reducing computational overhead. Theoretically, we prove a guarantee for the proposed noise-space Langevin dynamics to approximate the posterior, assuming that the generative model sufficiently approximates the prior distribution. Our framework is experimentally validated on image restoration tasks involving noisy linear and nonlinear forward operators applied to LSUN-Bedroom (256 × 256) and ImageNet (64 × 64) datasets. The results demonstrate that our approach generates high-fidelity samples with enhanced semantic diversity even under a limited number of function evaluations, offering superior efficiency and performance compared to existing diffusion-based posterior sampling techniques.
Vishal Purohit, Matthew Repasky, Jianfeng Lu 0001, Qiang Qiu 0001, Yao Xie 0002, Xiuyuan Cheng
CVPR2
2024 Stage-Regularized Neural Stein Critics For Testing Goodness-Of-Fit Of Generative Models
abstract
Learning to differentiate model distributions from observed data is a fundamental problem in statistics and machine learning, and high-dimensional data remains a challenging setting for such problems. Metrics that quantify the disparity in probability distributions, such as the Stein discrepancy, play an important role in high-dimensional statistical testing. This paper presents a method based on neural network Stein critics to distinguish between data sampled from an unknown probability distribution and a nominal model distribution with a novel staging of the weight of regularization. The benefit of using staged L2regularization in training such critics is demonstrated on evaluating generative models of image data.
Matthew Repasky, Xiuyuan Cheng, Yao Xie 0002
ICASSP1
2023 Neural Stein Critics With Staged L 2-Regularization
abstract
Learning to differentiate model distributions from observed data is a fundamental problem in statistics and machine learning, and high-dimensional data remains a challenging setting for such problems. Metrics that quantify the disparity in probability distributions, such as the Stein discrepancy, play an important role in high-dimensional statistical testing. In this paper, we investigate the role of$L^{2}$regularization in training a neural network Stein critic so as to distinguish between data sampled from an unknown probability distribution and a nominal model distribution. Making a connection to the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) theory, we develop a novel staging procedure for the weight of regularization over training time, which leverages the advantages of highly-regularized training at early times. Theoretically, we prove the approximation of the training dynamic by the kernel optimization, namely the “lazy training”, when the$L^{2}$regularization weight is large, and training on$n$samples converge at a rate of${O}(n^{-1/2})$up to a log factor. The result guarantees learning the optimal critic assuming sufficient alignment with the leading eigen-modes of the zero-time NTK. The benefit of the staged$L^{2}$regularization is demonstrated on simulated high dimensional data and an application to evaluating generative models of image data.
Matthew Repasky, Xiuyuan Cheng, Yao Xie 0002
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory1