Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Ethan Che

dblp:324/3569 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7770-6904ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Performance modeling and evaluation · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 57% Reinforcement learning · 43%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
1.012026
Exploration Sizing via Model-Predictive Control · WWW 2026
Performance modeling and evaluation
benchmarking
0.812024
QGym: Scalable Simulation and Benchmarking of Queuing Network Controllers · NeurIPS 2024
Performance modeling and evaluation › simulation › discrete-event simulation
queueing network simulation
0.812024
QGym: Scalable Simulation and Benchmarking of Queuing Network Controllers · NeurIPS 2024
Performance modeling and evaluation
simulation
0.812024
QGym: Scalable Simulation and Benchmarking of Queuing Network Controllers · NeurIPS 2024
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › revenue maximization
revenue guarantee
0.612022
Robustly Optimal Auction Design under Mean Constraints · EC 2022
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › auction design
revenue-maximizing auction
0.612022
Robustly Optimal Auction Design under Mean Constraints · EC 2022
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
robust mechanism design
0.612022
Robustly Optimal Auction Design under Mean Constraints · EC 2022
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design
auction design
0.212022
Robustly Optimal Auction Design under Mean Constraints · EC 2022
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › mechanism design › auction design
reserve price
0.212022
Robustly Optimal Auction Design under Mean Constraints · EC 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reinforcement learning · 1.5queueing theory · 1.5model predictive control · 1.0robust optimization · 0.6mechanism design · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Exploration Sizing via Model-Predictive Control
Ethan Che, Hakan Ceylan, James McInerney, Nathan Kallus
WWW1
2024 QGym: Scalable Simulation and Benchmarking of Queuing Network Controllers
abstract
Queuing network control allows allocation of scarce resources to manage congestion, a fundamental problem in manufacturing, communications, and healthcare. Compared to standard RL problems, queueing problems are distinguished by unique challenges: i) a system operating in continuous time, ii) high stochasticity, and iii) long horizons over which the system can become unstable (exploding delays). To provide the empirical foundations for methodological development tackling these challenges, we present an open-sourced queueing simulation framework, QGym, that benchmark queueing policies across realistic problem instances. Our modular framework allows the researchers to build on our initial instances, which provide a wide range of environments including parallel servers, criss-cross, tandem, and re-entrant networks, as well as a realistically calibrated hospital queuing system. From these, various policies can be easily tested, including both model-free RL methods and classical queuing policies. Our testbed significantly expands the scope of empirical benchmarking in prior work, and complements thetraditional focus on evaluating algorithms based on mathematical guarantees in idealized settings. QGym code is open-sourced at https://github.com/namkoong-lab/QGym.
Ethan Che, Tianyi Peng, Hongseok Namkoong
NeurIPS3
2022 Robustly Optimal Auction Design under Mean Constraints
abstract
We study a seller who sells a single good to multiple bidders with uncertainty over the joint distribution of bidders' valuations, as well as bidders' higher-order beliefs about their opponents. The seller only knows the (possibly asymmetric) means of the marginal distributions of each bidder's valuation and the range. An adversarial nature chooses the worst-case distribution within this ambiguity set along with the worst-case information structure. We find that a second-price auction with a symmetric, random reserve price obtains the optimal revenue guarantee within a broad class of mechanisms we refer to as competitive mechanisms, which include standard auction formats such as the first-price auction. The optimal mechanism possesses two notable characteristics. First, the mechanism treats all bidders identically even in the presence of ex-ante asymmetries. Second, when bidders have identical means and the number of bidders n grows large, the seller's optimal reserve price converges in probability to a non-binding reserve price and the revenue guarantee converges to the mean at rate O(1/n).
Ethan Che
EC1