Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marios Aristodemou

dblp:324/5788 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-7199-8133ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Physical-layer communications · 75% Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 25%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-AI interaction · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Physical-layer communications
channel state information
0.912025
Reinforcement Learning-Based Downlink Transmit Precoding for Mitigating the Impact of Delayed CSI in Satellite Systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025
Physical-layer communications › channel state information
delayed CSIT
0.912025
Reinforcement Learning-Based Downlink Transmit Precoding for Mitigating the Impact of Delayed CSI in Satellite Systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025
Physical-layer communications › MIMO › massive MIMO
downlink precoding
0.912025
Reinforcement Learning-Based Downlink Transmit Precoding for Mitigating the Impact of Delayed CSI in Satellite Systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks
satellite communication
0.912025
Reinforcement Learning-Based Downlink Transmit Precoding for Mitigating the Impact of Delayed CSI in Satellite Systems · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning
federated learning
0.912025
Maximizing Uncertainty for Federated Learning via Bayesian Optimization-Based Model Poisoning · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
Security and privacy of machine learning › poisoning attack
model poisoning attack
0.912025
Maximizing Uncertainty for Federated Learning via Bayesian Optimization-Based Model Poisoning · IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fairness auditing
0.312026
Empowering Stakeholders with Participatory Auditing of Predictive AI: Perspectives from End-Users and Decision Subjects without AI Expertise · CHI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

co-design workshops · 2.0reinforcement learning · 0.9least squares trust region · 0.9bayesian optimization · 0.9KL divergence · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Empowering Stakeholders with Participatory Auditing of Predictive AI: Perspectives from End-Users and Decision Subjects without AI Expertise
abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) applications have become ubiquitous in their impact on individuals and society, highlighting a crucial need for their responsible development. Recent research has called for participatory AI auditing, empowering individuals without AI expertise to audit AI applications throughout the entire AI development pipeline. Our work focuses on investigating how to support these kinds of auditors through participatory AI auditing tools and processes. We conducted a series of co-design workshops, using two health-related predictive AI applications as examples. Our results show that participants wanted to be part of AI audits, and were insightful in identifying the potential impacts of applications, but needed to be assisted in conducting audits, especially how to measure impacts. Importantly, participants provided examples of impacts not considered in current risk/harm taxonomies. Our findings provide implications for the design of tools and processes to empower everyone to contribute to responsible AI development in the future.
Patrizia Di Campli San Vito, Evangelia Fringi, Penny S. Johnston, Leonardo C. T. Bezerra, Marios Aristodemou, Siamak F. Shahandashti, Emily O'Hara, Laura Fiona Whyte, Mark Wong, Ayah Soufan, Yashar Moshfeghi, Simone Stumpf
CHI5
2026 Intelligent asset parameterisation for risk-based moving target defence
abstract
In an era characterised by evolving cyber threats and sophisticated adversar-ial behaviour, the field of cyber-security faces a continuous and formidablechallenge. The development of dynamic and adaptive security control mea-sures is imperative in order to safeguard critical assets and information.This article delves into the realm of Moving Target Defence (MTD), astrategic approach that seeks to outmanoeuvre adversaries by constantlyshifting the security landscape. Our research specifically focuses on the ap-plication of Reinforcement Learning (RL) in MTD, with a focus on threatexposure and the efficacy of control strategies with respect to risk reduction.A defensive RL agent is proposed that incorporates attack graphs as ablueprint to assess possible paths that an adversary may take. By consideringreceived events about an adversary’s actions, the defensive agent continuouslyupdates its knowledge about the adversary’s position on the attack graph.The proposed research establishes and evaluates a risk-based, RL-drivenagent capable of MTD operations in order to address adversarial behaviours.The proposed approach provides valuable insights into optimally deployingsecurity controls under dynamic threat scenarios and restricted budget resources.
Konstantinos G. Kyriakopoulos, Lincoln Kamau Kiarie, Marios Aristodemou, Susan Babirye, Amit Patel 0002, Isaiah Nassiuma, Mercedeh Rezaei, Iain Phillips 0002, Anhtuan Le, Carsten Maple, Gregory Epiphaniou
Comput. Secur.3
2025 Reinforcement Learning-Based Downlink Transmit Precoding for Mitigating the Impact of Delayed CSI in Satellite Systems
abstract
In this paper,..........
Yasaman Omid, Marios Aristodemou, Sangarapillai Lambotharan, Mahsa Derakhshani, Lajos Hanzo
IEEE Trans. Commun.2
2025 Maximizing Uncertainty for Federated Learning via Bayesian Optimization-Based Model Poisoning
abstract
As we transition from Narrow Artificial Intelligence towards Artificial Super Intelligence, users are increasingly concerned about their privacy and the trustworthiness of machine learning (ML) technology. A common denominator for the metrics of trustworthiness is the quantification of uncertainty inherent in DL algorithms, and specifically in the model parameters, input data, and model predictions. One of the common approaches to address privacy-related issues in DL is to adopt distributed learning such as federated learning (FL), where private raw data is not shared among users. Despite the privacy-preserving mechanisms in FL, it still faces challenges in trustworthiness. Specifically, the malicious users, during training, can systematically create malicious model parameters to compromise the models’ predictive and generative capabilities, resulting in high uncertainty about their reliability. To demonstrate malicious behaviour, we propose a novel model poisoning attack method named Delphi which aims to maximise the uncertainty of the global model output. We achieve this by taking advantage of the relationship between the uncertainty and the model parameters of the first hidden layer of the local model. Delphi employs two types of optimisation, Bayesian Optimisation and Least Squares Trust Region, to search for the optimal poisoned model parameters, named as Delphi-BO and Delphi-LSTR. We quantify the uncertainty using the KL Divergence to minimise the distance of the predictive probability distribution towards an uncertain distribution of model output. Furthermore, we establish a mathematical proof for the attack effectiveness demonstrated in FL. Numerical results demonstrate that Delphi-BO induces a higher amount of uncertainty than Delphi-LSTR highlighting vulnerability of FL systems to model poisoning attacks.
Marios Aristodemou, Xiaolan Liu 0001, Yuan Wang 0008, Konstantinos G. Kyriakopoulos, Sangarapillai Lambotharan, Qingsong Wei
IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.1
2023 Adversarial Poisoning Attacks on Federated Learning in Metaverse
abstract
Metaverse is envisioned to be a human-centric framework, and provide a new concept of living by offering comprehensively immersive experience for users in education, medicine and entertainment domain. Since a large amount of private data is generated at each user for accessing Metaverse, the emerging federated learning (FL) provides an effective solution to address the potential privacy leakage of data sharing by adopting the mechanism of local training and global model aggregation. However, the model aggregation is susceptible to adversarial poisoning attacks. This imposes critical issues for the privacy-preserving mechanism in Metaverse. In this research, we develop two poisoning attacks in order to emulate the behaviour of adversaries possibly existing in practical Metaverse scenarios. First, we develop a data poisoning attack using Bayesian optimisation to search for the optimal parameters of generating adversarial examples to conduct reversed adversarial training. Second, we develop a model poisoning attack where we apply layer optimisation using Bayesian optimisation to search the optimal weights for the convolutional layer in order to induce uncertainty in the classification. Numerical results show that both attack schemes can cause attacks that can not be recognised by the FL server, and layer optimisation is a stronger poisoning attack.
Marios Aristodemou, Xiaolan Liu 0001, Sangarapillai Lambotharan
ICC1