Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dylan Epstein-Gross

dblp:324/6276 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 49% Motion planning and robot control · 28% Trustworthy machine learning · 15%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › alignment
scalable oversight
1.012026
Confirmation Bias: A Challenge for Scalable Oversight · AAAI 2026
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
confirmation bias
0.312026
Confirmation Bias: A Challenge for Scalable Oversight · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probabilistic modeling · 0.6model-based motion planning · 0.6few-shot learning · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Confirmation Bias: A Challenge for Scalable Oversight
Gabriel Recchia, Chatrik Singh Mangat, Jinu Nyachhyon, Mridul Sharma, Callum Canavan, Dylan Epstein-Gross, Muhammed Abdulbari
AAAI6
2022 Locomotion as a Risk-mitigating Behavior in Uncertain Environments: A Rapid Planning and Few-shot Failure Adaptation Approach
abstract
We want robots to complete assigned tasks even when unexpected task pressures arise, either from the robot or the environment. This paper presents a method of both learning sources of task failure in situ and rapidly planning new motions on-the-fly to accommodate them. This “risk-adaptive” approach to robot control uses a few encounters with a novel failure mode to generate a probabilistic failure model which we use to optimize a risk-mitigating motion plan. We demonstrate two toy problems, where risk-adaptive double-integrator agents are introduced to separate environments, each with their own tasks and modes of failure. The agents are not aware a priori of any risks the environments might present, but after one failure, the agents quickly adapt their motion plans and ensure task completion. We further conduct numerical experiments to characterize the algorithm's speed of adaptation with respect to environmental uncertainty. We see this framework as a natural extension for the myriad of robotic applications using model-based motion planners.
Jacob Hackett, Dylan Epstein-Gross, Monica A. Daley, Christian Hubicki
ICRA2