Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Prabhakar H. Pathak
dblp:324/7799
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 1991
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer networks
1 paper |
Physical-layer communications · 100% |
Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical-layer communications › propagation › electromagnetic wave propagation
electromagnetic scattering |
0.0 | 1 | 1991 | Analysis of EM penetration into and scattering by electrically large open waveguide cavities using Gaussian beam shooting · Proc. IEEE 1991 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reciprocity integral · 0.0gaussian beam shooting · 0.0gabor expansion · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1991 | Analysis of EM penetration into and scattering by electrically large open waveguide cavities using Gaussian beam shootingabstractGaussian beam (GB) representation methods are used to analyze the electromagnetic coupling into and the scattering by a large nonuniform cavity. The aperture field in the cavity is decomposed into beams using the Gabor expansion, and shooting techniques are then employed. The method is illustrated only for the two-dimensional (2-D) case. The GBs are tracked axially using the rules of beam optics which ignore any beam distortion upon reflection at the walls. The effects of beam distortion are not significant for relatively slowly varying waveguide cavities. The field scattered into the exterior by the termination within the cavity is found using a reciprocity integral formulation which requires a knowledge of the beam fields near the termination. Numerical results based on this GB approach are presented and compared with results based on an independent reference solution.> Robert J. Burkholder, Prabhakar H. Pathak |
Proc. IEEE | 2 |