EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Connor Wagaman
dblp:324/8040
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-2459-3886ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Privacy and data protection · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy |
1.3 | 2 | 2024 | Time-Aware Projections: Truly Node-Private Graph Statistics under Continual Observation · SP 2024 Widespread Underestimation of Sensitivity in Differentially Private Libraries and How to Fix It · CCS 2022 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
continual release |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Time-Aware Projections: Truly Node-Private Graph Statistics under Continual Observation · SP 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › data publishing › privacy-preserving data publishing
graph data publishing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Time-Aware Projections: Truly Node-Private Graph Statistics under Continual Observation · SP 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private graph algorithms
node-differential privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Time-Aware Projections: Truly Node-Private Graph Statistics under Continual Observation · SP 2024 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
graph algorithms |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Time-Aware Projections: Truly Node-Private Graph Statistics under Continual Observation · SP 2024 |
Graph algorithms and graph theory
subgraph counting |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Time-Aware Projections: Truly Node-Private Graph Statistics under Continual Observation · SP 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
propose-test-release · 1.5differential privacy · 1.5projection algorithms · 0.8projection algorithm · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Time-Aware Projections: Truly Node-Private Graph Statistics under Continual ObservationabstractReleasing differentially private statistics about social network data is challenging: one individual’s data consists of a node and all of its connections, and typical analyses are sensitive to the insertion of a single unusual node in the network. This challenge is further complicated in the continual release setting, where the network varies over time and one wants to release information at many time points as the network grows. Previous work addresses node-private continual release by assuming an unenforced promise on the maximum degree in a graph; indeed, the algorithms from these works exhibit blatant privacy violations when the degree bound is not met.In this work, we describe the first algorithms that satisfy the standard notion of node-differential privacy in the continual release setting (i.e., without an assumed promise on the input streams). These algorithms are accurate on sparse graphs, for several fundamental graph problems: counting edges, triangles, other subgraphs, and connected components; and releasing degree histograms. Our unconditionally private algorithms generally have optimal error, up to polylogarithmic factors and lower-order terms.We provide general transformations that take a base algorithm for the continual release setting, which need only be private for streams satisfying a promised degree bound, and produce an algorithm that is unconditionally private yet mimics the base algorithm when the stream meets the degree bound (and adds only linear overhead to the time and space complexity of the base algorithm). To do so, we design new projection algorithms for graph streams, based on the batch-model techniques of [BBDS13; DLL16], which modify the stream to limit its degree. Our main technical innovation is to show that the projections are stable—meaning that similar input graphs have similar projections—when the input stream satisfies a privately testable safety condition. Our transformation then follows a novel online variant of the Propose-Test-Release framework [DL09], privately testing the safety condition before releasing output at each step. Palak Jain 0004, Adam D. Smith 0001, Connor Wagaman |
SP | 3 |
| 2022 | Widespread Underestimation of Sensitivity in Differentially Private Libraries and How to Fix ItabstractWe identify a new class of vulnerabilities in implementations of differential privacy. Specifically, they arise when computing basic statistics such as sums, thanks to discrepancies between the implemented arithmetic using finite data types (namely, ints or floats) and idealized arithmetic over the reals or integers. These discrepancies cause the sensitivity of the implemented statistics (i.e., how much one individual's data can affect the result) to be much larger than the sensitivity we expect. Consequently, essentially all differential privacy libraries fail to introduce enough noise to hide individual-level information as required by differential privacy, and we show that this may be exploited in realistic attacks on differentially private query systems. In addition to presenting these vulnerabilities, we also provide a number of solutions, which modify or constrain the way in which the sum is implemented in order to recover the idealized or near-idealized bounds on sensitivity. Sílvia Casacuberta, Michael Shoemate, Salil P. Vadhan, Connor Wagaman |
CCS | 4 |