EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Paul Brunzema
dblp:324/8229
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Optimization for machine learning · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 50% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian Optimization via Continual Variational Last Layer Training · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › model-based optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Bayesian Optimization via Continual Variational Last Layer Training · ICLR 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
bayesian optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
black-box optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
continuous optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
nonlinear optimization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › nonlinear optimization
sequential quadratic programming |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization
constrained optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming · NeurIPS 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization › convex optimization › conic optimization
second-order cone programming |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic Programming · NeurIPS 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
variational bayesian last layer · 0.9thompson sampling · 0.9line search · 0.9gaussian process surrogate · 0.9gaussian process conditioning · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Bayesian Optimization via Continual Variational Last Layer TrainingabstractGaussian Processes (GPs) are widely seen as the state-of-the-art surrogate models for Bayesian optimization (BO) due to their ability to model uncertainty and their performance on tasks where correlations are easily captured (such as those defined by Euclidean metrics) and their ability to be efficiently updated online. However, the performance of GPs depends on the choice of kernel, and kernel selection for complex correlation structures is often difficult or must be made bespoke. While Bayesian neural networks (BNNs) are a promising direction for higher capacity surrogate models, they have so far seen limited use due to poor performance on some problem types. In this paper, we propose an approach which shows competitive performance on many problem types, including some that BNNs typically struggle with. We build on variational Bayesian last layers (VBLLs), and connect training of these models to exact conditioning in GPs. We exploit this connection to develop an efficient online training algorithm that interleaves conditioning and optimization. Our findings suggest that VBLL networks significantly outperform GPs and other BNN architectures on tasks with complex input correlations, and match the performance of well-tuned GPs on established benchmark tasks. Paul Brunzema, Mikkel Jordahn, John Willes, Sebastian Trimpe, Jasper Snoek, James Harrison |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2025 | BayeSQP: Bayesian Optimization through Sequential Quadratic ProgrammingabstractWe introduce BayeSQP, a novel algorithm for general black-box optimization that merges the structure of sequential quadratic programming with concepts from Bayesian optimization. BayeSQP employs second-order Gaussian process surrogates for both the objective and constraints to jointly model the function values, gradients, and Hessian from only zero-order information. At each iteration, a local subproblem is constructed using the GP posterior estimates and solved to obtain a search direction. Crucially, the formulation of the subproblem explicitly incorporates uncertainty in both the function and derivative estimates, resulting in a tractable second-order cone program for high probability improvements under model uncertainty. A subsequent one-dimensional line search via constrained Thompson sampling selects the next evaluation point. Empirical results show that BayeSQP outperforms state-of-the-art methods in specific high-dimensional settings. Our algorithm offers a principled and flexible framework that bridges classical optimization techniques with modern approaches to black-box optimization. Paul Brunzema, Sebastian Trimpe |
NeurIPS | 1 |