Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Adi Horowitz

dblp:324/8476 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Parallel and multicore computing · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithms and data structures · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computation models
massively parallel computation
0.612022
Massively Parallel Computation in a Heterogeneous Regime · PODC 2022
Algorithms and data structures › parallel algorithms
parallel graph algorithms
0.612022
Massively Parallel Computation in a Heterogeneous Regime · PODC 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spanner construction · 1.1maximal matching · 1.1MST algorithm · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Massively parallel computation in a heterogeneous regime
abstract
Abstract Massively-parallel graph algorithms have received extensive attention over the past decade, with research focusing on three memory regimes: the superlinear regime, the near-linear regime, and the sublinear regime. The sublinear regime is the most desirable in practice, but conditional hardness results point towards its limitations. In this work we study a heterogeneous model, where the memory of the machines varies in size. We focus mostly on the heterogeneous setting created by adding a single near-linear machine to the sublinear MPC regime, and show that even a single large machine suffices to circumvent most of the conditional hardness results for the sublinear regime: for graphs with n vertices and m edges, we give (a) an MST algorithm that runs in $$O(\log \log (m/n))$$ O ( log log ( m / n ) ) rounds; (b) an algorithm that constructs an O(k)-spanner of size $$O(n^{1+1/k})$$ O ( n 1 + 1 / k ) in O(1) rounds; and (c) a maximal-matching algorithm that runs in $$O(\sqrt{\log (m/n)}\log \log (m/n))$$ O ( log ( m / n ) log log ( m / n ) ) rounds. We also observe that the best known near-linear MPC algorithms for several other graph problems which are conjectured to be hard in the sublinear regime (minimum cut, maximal independent set, and vertex coloring) can easily be transformed to work in the heterogeneous MPC model with a single near-linear machine, while retaining their original round complexity in the near-linear regime. If the large machine is allowed to have superlinear memory, all of the problems above can be solved in O(1) rounds.
Orr Fischer, Adi Horowitz, Rotem Oshman
Distributed Comput.2
2022 Massively Parallel Computation in a Heterogeneous Regime
abstract
Massively-parallel graph algorithms have received extensive attention over the past decade, with research focusing on three memory regimes: the superlinear regime, the near-linear regime, and the sublinear regime. The sublinear regime is the most desirable in practice, but conditional hardness results point towards its limitations. In this work we study a heterogeneous model, where the memory of the machines varies in size. We focus mostly on the heterogeneous setting created by adding a single near-linear machine to the sublinear MPC regime, and show that even a single large machine suffices to circumvent most of the conditional hardness results for the sublinear regime: for graphs with n vertices and m edges, we give (a) an MST algorithm that runs in O(łogłog(m/n)) rounds; (b) an algorithm that constructs an O(k)-spanner of size O(n^1+1/k ) in O(1) rounds; and (c) a maximal-matching algorithm that runs in O(√łog(m/n) łogłog(m/n)) rounds. We also observe that the best known near-linear MPC algorithms for several other graph problems which are conjectured to be hard in the sublinear regime (minimum cut, maximal independent set, and vertex coloring) can easily be transformed to work in the heterogeneous MPC model with a single near-linear machine, while retaining their original round complexity in the near-linear regime. If the large machine is allowed to have superlinear memory, all of the problems above can be solved in O(1) rounds.
Orr Fischer, Adi Horowitz, Rotem Oshman
PODC2