Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adi Horowitz
dblp:324/8476
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Parallel and multicore computing · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computation models
massively parallel computation |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Massively Parallel Computation in a Heterogeneous Regime · PODC 2022 |
Algorithms and data structures › parallel algorithms
parallel graph algorithms |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Massively Parallel Computation in a Heterogeneous Regime · PODC 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
spanner construction · 1.1maximal matching · 1.1MST algorithm · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Massively parallel computation in a heterogeneous regimeabstractAbstract Massively-parallel graph algorithms have received extensive attention over the past decade, with research focusing on three memory regimes: the superlinear regime, the near-linear regime, and the sublinear regime. The sublinear regime is the most desirable in practice, but conditional hardness results point towards its limitations. In this work we study a heterogeneous model, where the memory of the machines varies in size. We focus mostly on the heterogeneous setting created by adding a single near-linear machine to the sublinear MPC regime, and show that even a single large machine suffices to circumvent most of the conditional hardness results for the sublinear regime: for graphs with n vertices and m edges, we give (a) an MST algorithm that runs in $$O(\log \log (m/n))$$ O ( log log ( m / n ) ) rounds; (b) an algorithm that constructs an O(k)-spanner of size $$O(n^{1+1/k})$$ O ( n 1 + 1 / k ) in O(1) rounds; and (c) a maximal-matching algorithm that runs in $$O(\sqrt{\log (m/n)}\log \log (m/n))$$ O ( log ( m / n ) log log ( m / n ) ) rounds. We also observe that the best known near-linear MPC algorithms for several other graph problems which are conjectured to be hard in the sublinear regime (minimum cut, maximal independent set, and vertex coloring) can easily be transformed to work in the heterogeneous MPC model with a single near-linear machine, while retaining their original round complexity in the near-linear regime. If the large machine is allowed to have superlinear memory, all of the problems above can be solved in O(1) rounds. Orr Fischer, Adi Horowitz, Rotem Oshman |
Distributed Comput. | 2 |
| 2022 | Massively Parallel Computation in a Heterogeneous RegimeabstractMassively-parallel graph algorithms have received extensive attention over the past decade, with research focusing on three memory regimes: the superlinear regime, the near-linear regime, and the sublinear regime. The sublinear regime is the most desirable in practice, but conditional hardness results point towards its limitations. In this work we study a heterogeneous model, where the memory of the machines varies in size. We focus mostly on the heterogeneous setting created by adding a single near-linear machine to the sublinear MPC regime, and show that even a single large machine suffices to circumvent most of the conditional hardness results for the sublinear regime: for graphs with n vertices and m edges, we give (a) an MST algorithm that runs in O(łogłog(m/n)) rounds; (b) an algorithm that constructs an O(k)-spanner of size O(n^1+1/k ) in O(1) rounds; and (c) a maximal-matching algorithm that runs in O(√łog(m/n) łogłog(m/n)) rounds. We also observe that the best known near-linear MPC algorithms for several other graph problems which are conjectured to be hard in the sublinear regime (minimum cut, maximal independent set, and vertex coloring) can easily be transformed to work in the heterogeneous MPC model with a single near-linear machine, while retaining their original round complexity in the near-linear regime. If the large machine is allowed to have superlinear memory, all of the problems above can be solved in O(1) rounds. Orr Fischer, Adi Horowitz, Rotem Oshman |
PODC | 2 |