Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rachith Aiyappa

dblp:324/8600 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Graph learning · 50% Trustworthy machine learning · 25% Reinforcement learning · 25%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
benchmark design
0.912025
Implicit degree bias in the link prediction task · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network › trustworthy graph neural networks
degree bias
0.912025
Implicit degree bias in the link prediction task · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness and bias
evaluation bias
0.912025
Implicit degree bias in the link prediction task · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Graph learning
link prediction
0.912025
Implicit degree bias in the link prediction task · ICML 2025
Information retrieval
evaluation
0.312025
Implicit degree bias in the link prediction task · ICML 2025

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

edge sampling · 1.7degree correction · 1.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Implicit degree bias in the link prediction task
abstract
Link prediction---a task of distinguishing actual hidden edges from random unconnected node pairs---is one of the quintessential tasks in graph machine learning. Despite being widely accepted as a universal benchmark and a downstream task for representation learning, the link prediction benchmark's validity has rarely been questioned. Here, we show that the common edge sampling procedure in the link prediction task has an implicit bias toward high-degree nodes. This produces a highly skewed evaluation that favors methods overly dependent on node degree. In fact a ``null'' link prediction method based solely on node degree can yield nearly optimal performance in this setting. We propose a degree-corrected link prediction benchmark that offers a more reasonable assessment and better aligns with the performance on the recommendation task. Finally, we demonstrate that the degree-corrected benchmark can more effectively train graph machine-learning models by reducing overfitting to node degrees and facilitating the learning of relevant structures in graphs.
Rachith Aiyappa, Munjung Kim, Ozgur Can Seckin, Yong-Yeol Ahn, Sadamori Kojaku
ICML1
2023 A Multi-Platform Collection of Social Media Posts about the 2022 U.S. Midterm Elections
abstract
Social media are utilized by millions of citizens to discuss important political issues. Politicians use these platforms to connect with the public and broadcast policy positions. Therefore, data from social media has enabled many studies of political discussion. While most analyses are limited to data from individual platforms, people are embedded in a larger information ecosystem spanning multiple social networks. Here we describe and provide access to the Indiana University 2022 U.S. Midterms Multi-Platform Social Media Dataset (MEIU22), a collection of social media posts from Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Reddit, and 4chan. MEIU22 links to posts about the midterm elections based on a comprehensive list of keywords and tracks the social media accounts of 1,011 candidates from October 1 to December 25, 2022. We also publish the source code of our pipeline to enable similar multi-platform research projects.
Rachith Aiyappa, Matthew DeVerna, Manita Pote, Bao Tran Truong, Wanying Zhao, David Axelrod, Aria Pessianzadeh, Zoher Kachwala, Munjung Kim, Ozgur Can Seckin, Minsuk Kim, Sunny Gandhi, Amrutha Manikonda, Francesco Pierri 0002, Filippo Menczer, Kai-Cheng Yang
ICWSM1