Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lennart Rietdorf
dblp:324/8702
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Vision and language · 60% Trustworthy machine learning · 40% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › Vision and language › multimodal understanding
description-based classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Does VLM Classification Benefit from LLM Description Semantics? · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
explainable AI |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Does VLM Classification Benefit from LLM Description Semantics? · AAAI 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Does VLM Classification Benefit from LLM Description Semantics? · AAAI 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Does VLM Classification Benefit from LLM Description Semantics? · AAAI 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
vision-language model classification |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Does VLM Classification Benefit from LLM Description Semantics? · AAAI 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 0.9CLIP · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Does VLM Classification Benefit from LLM Description Semantics?abstractAccurately describing images with text is a foundation of explainable AI. Vision-Language Models (VLMs) like CLIP have recently addressed this by aligning images and texts in a shared embedding space, expressing semantic similarities between vision and language embeddings. VLM classification can be improved with descriptions generated by Large Language Models (LLMs). However, it is difficult to determine the contribution of actual description semantics, as the performance gain may also stem from a semantic-agnostic ensembling effect, where multiple modified text prompts act as a noisy test-time augmentation for the original one. We propose an alternative evaluation scenario to decide if a performance boost of LLM-generated descriptions is caused by such a noise augmentation effect or rather by genuine description semantics. The proposed scenario avoids noisy test-time augmentation and ensures that genuine, distinctive descriptions cause the performance boost. Furthermore, we propose a training-free method for selecting discriminative descriptions that work independently of classname-ensembling effects. Our approach identifies descriptions that effectively differentiate classes within a local CLIP label neighborhood, improving classification accuracy across seven datasets. Additionally, we provide insights into the explainability of description-based image classification using VLMs. Pingchuan Ma 0006, Lennart Rietdorf, Dmytro Kotovenko, Vincent Tao Hu, Björn Ommer |
AAAI | 2 |