Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Geunwoo Kim
dblp:325/0894
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Language models and text generation · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Language Models can Solve Computer Tasks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
prompting |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Language Models can Solve Computer Tasks · NeurIPS 2023 |
Program analysis
binary analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Improving cross-platform binary analysis using representation learning via graph alignment · ISSTA 2022 |
Program analysis › binary analysis
binary code similarity detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Improving cross-platform binary analysis using representation learning via graph alignment · ISSTA 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning from human feedback · 0.7chain-of-thought · 0.7representation learning · 0.6graph embedding · 0.6graph alignment · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Language Models can Solve Computer TasksabstractAgents capable of carrying out general tasks on a computer can improve efficiency and productivity by automating repetitive tasks and assisting in complex problem-solving. Ideally, such agents should be able to solve new computer tasks presented to them through natural language commands. However, previous approaches to this problem require large amounts of expert demonstrations and task-specific reward functions, both of which are impractical for new tasks. In this work, we show that a pre-trained large language model (LLM) agent can execute computer tasks guided by natural language using a simple prompting scheme where the agent \textbf{R}ecursively \textbf{C}riticizes and \textbf{I}mproves its output (RCI). The RCI approach significantly outperforms existing LLM methods for automating computer tasks and surpasses supervised learning (SL) and reinforcement learning (RL) approaches on the MiniWoB++ benchmark.
We compare multiple LLMs and find that RCI with the InstructGPT-3+RLHF LLM is state-of-the-art on MiniWoB++, using only a handful of demonstrations per task rather than tens of thousands, and without a task-specific reward function. Furthermore, we demonstrate RCI prompting's effectiveness in enhancing LLMs' reasoning abilities on a suite of natural language reasoning tasks, outperforming chain of thought (CoT) prompting with external feedback. We find that RCI combined with CoT performs better than either separately. Our code can be found here: https://github.com/posgnu/rci-agent. Geunwoo Kim, Pierre Baldi, Stephen McAleer |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | Improving cross-platform binary analysis using representation learning via graph alignmentabstractCross-platform binary analysis requires a common representation of binaries across platforms, on which a specific analysis can be performed. Recent work proposed to learn low-dimensional, numeric vector representations (i.e., embeddings) of disassembled binary code, and perform binary analysis in the embedding space. Unfortunately, however, existing techniques fall short in that they are either (i) specific to a single platform producing embeddings not aligned across platforms, or (ii) not designed to capture the rich contextual information available in a disassembled binary. Geunwoo Kim, Sanghyun Hong 0001, Michael Franz, Dokyung Song |
ISSTA | 1 |