Demo Data from EDBT 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benjamin Fauber
dblp:325/1779
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Learning paradigms · 33% Trustworthy machine learning · 33% Learning theory · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
class imbalance |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robust High-Dimensional Classification From Few Positive Examples · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › classification
high-dimensional classification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robust High-Dimensional Classification From Few Positive Examples · IJCAI 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robust High-Dimensional Classification From Few Positive Examples · IJCAI 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
smoothing · 0.6robust optimization · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Robust High-Dimensional Classification From Few Positive ExamplesabstractWe tackle an extreme form of imbalanced classification, with up to 105 features but as few as 5 samples from the minority class. This problem occurs in predicting predicting tumor types and fraud detection, among others. Standard imbalanced classification methods are not designed for such severe data scarcity. Sampling-based methods need too many samples due to the high-dimensionality, while cost-based methods must place too high a weight on the limited minority samples. Our proposed method, called DIRECT, bypasses sample generation by training the classifier over a robust smoothed distribution of the minority class. DIRECT is fast, simple, robust, parameter-free, and easy to interpret. We validate DIRECT on several real-world datasets spanning document, image, and medical classification. DIRECT is up to 5x − 7x better than SMOTE-like methods, 30−200% better than ensemble methods, 3x − 7x better than cost-sensitive methods. The greatest gains are for settings with the fewest samples in the minority class, where DIRECT’s robustness is most helpful. Deepayan Chakrabarti, Benjamin Fauber |
IJCAI | 2 |