EDBT 2026 Demo / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maximilian Sprang
dblp:325/2162
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-8438-4747ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
metabolomics |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Cross-domain transfer learning from peptides to metabolites using a multi-property fine-tuned LLM · Bioinform. 2026 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › metabolomics
retention time prediction |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Cross-domain transfer learning from peptides to metabolites using a multi-property fine-tuned LLM · Bioinform. 2026 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 1.0multi-task learning · 1.0LLM fine-tuning · 1.0ChemBERTa · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Cross-domain transfer learning from peptides to metabolites using a multi-property fine-tuned LLMabstractMOTIVATION: Accurate liquid chromatography retention time (RT) prediction is a critical component of compound identification in metabolomics and lipidomics. However, existing RT prediction approaches are often limited by the scarcity of experimental RT measurements for many molecular classes, restricting model generalization and the construction of comprehensive RT libraries. Transfer learning from data-rich chemical domains offers a potential strategy to overcome these limitations, but its effectiveness for metabolite RT prediction remains insufficiently explored. RESULTS: We developed a transfer learning framework based on ChemBERTa that leverages large peptide datasets to improve metabolite RT prediction under data-sparse conditions. A peptide-pretrained model was trained using a multi-task objective that jointly predicted RT and seven RDKit-derived molecular descriptors. Compared with an RT-only model, the multi-task approach learned more robust chemical representations and demonstrated superior generalization to metabolites, achieving a median test R² of 0.842 versus 0.820. When transferred to metabolite RT prediction, the multi-task pretrained model substantially outperformed models trained from scratch at low-data regimes. Using only 3% of metabolite training data (2129 compounds), transfer learning achieved a median test R² of 0.322 compared with 0.216 for the baseline model, while reducing MAE from 131.7 to 114.9. Significant improvements were also observed at 5% and 10% training fractions, with benefits gradually diminishing as larger metabolite datasets became available. In contrast, a peptide-pretrained single-task RT model showed performance comparable to the baseline, indicating that the observed gains arise primarily from multi-task molecular property learning rather than peptide pretraining alone. These findings demonstrate that multi-task transfer learning provides an effective and scalable strategy for improving RT prediction in metabolomics, particularly when experimental training data are limited. AVAILABILITY: Freely available on https://github.com/uchealex/CHEMBEDDING. Uchenna Alex Anyaegbunam, David Teschner, Thierry Schmidlin, Andreas Hildebrandt 0001, Johannes U. Mayer, Maximilian Sprang, Miguel A. Andrade-Navarro |
Bioinform. | 6 |
| 2022 | Batch effect detection and correction in RNA-seq data using machine-learning-based automated assessment of qualityabstractBACKGROUND: The constant evolving and development of next-generation sequencing techniques lead to high throughput data composed of datasets that include a large number of biological samples. Although a large number of samples are usually experimentally processed by batches, scientific publications are often elusive about this information, which can greatly impact the quality of the samples and confound further statistical analyzes. Because dedicated bioinformatics methods developed to detect unwanted sources of variance in the data can wrongly detect real biological signals, such methods could benefit from using a quality-aware approach. RESULTS: We recently developed statistical guidelines and a machine learning tool to automatically evaluate the quality of a next-generation-sequencing sample. We leveraged this quality assessment to detect and correct batch effects in 12 publicly available RNA-seq datasets with available batch information. We were able to distinguish batches by our quality score and used it to correct for some batch effects in sample clustering. Overall, the correction was evaluated as comparable to or better than the reference method that uses a priori knowledge of the batches (in 10 and 1 datasets of 12, respectively; total = 92%). When coupled to outlier removal, the correction was more often evaluated as better than the reference (comparable or better in 5 and 6 datasets of 12, respectively; total = 92%). CONCLUSIONS: In this work, we show the capabilities of our software to detect batches in public RNA-seq datasets from differences in the predicted quality of their samples. We also use these insights to correct the batch effect and observe the relation of sample quality and batch effect. These observations reinforce our expectation that while batch effects do correlate with differences in quality, batch effects also arise from other artifacts and are more suitably corrected statistically in well-designed experiments. Maximilian Sprang, Miguel A. Andrade-Navarro, Jean-Fred Fontaine |
BMC Bioinform. | 1 |