Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Eliana Rodriguez Herrera

dblp:325/3615 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Wireless sensing and localization · 87% Wireless networking · 13%
Network and information security
1 paper
Network security · 50% Authentication and access control · 50%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wireless sensing and localization › tracking
device tracking
0.612022
Evaluating Physical-Layer BLE Location Tracking Attacks on Mobile Devices · SP 2022
Wireless sensing and localization
radio frequency fingerprinting
0.612022
Evaluating Physical-Layer BLE Location Tracking Attacks on Mobile Devices · SP 2022
Authentication and access control
device identification
0.612022
Evaluating Physical-Layer BLE Location Tracking Attacks on Mobile Devices · SP 2022
Network security
traffic analysis
0.612022
Evaluating Physical-Layer BLE Location Tracking Attacks on Mobile Devices · SP 2022
Wireless networking › wireless network protocols
bluetooth low energy
0.212022
Evaluating Physical-Layer BLE Location Tracking Attacks on Mobile Devices · SP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

field study · 1.1empirical measurement · 1.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Evaluating Physical-Layer BLE Location Tracking Attacks on Mobile Devices
abstract
Mobile devices increasingly function as wireless tracking beacons. Using the Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE) protocol, mobile devices such as smartphones and smartwatches continuously transmit beacons to inform passive listeners about device locations for applications such as digital contact tracing for COVID-19, and even finding lost devices. These applications use cryptographic anonymity that limit an adversary’s ability to use these beacons to stalk a user. However, attackers can bypass these defenses by fingerprinting the unique physical-layer imperfections in the transmissions of specific devices.We empirically demonstrate that there are several key challenges that can limit an attacker’s ability to find a stable physical layer identifier to uniquely identify mobile devices using BLE, including variations in the hardware design of BLE chipsets, transmission power levels, differences in thermal conditions, and limitations of inexpensive radios that can be widely deployed to capture raw physical-layer signals. We evaluated how much each of these factors limits accurate fingerprinting in a large-scale field study of hundreds of uncontrolled BLE devices, revealing that physical-layer identification is a viable, although sometimes unreliable, way for an attacker to track mobile devices.
Hadi Givehchian, Nishant Bhaskar, Eliana Rodriguez Herrera, Héctor Rodrigo López Soto, Christian Dameff, Dinesh Bharadia, Aaron Schulman
SP3