Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Wichayaporn Wongkamjan

dblp:325/4756 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Reinforcement learning · 73% Multi-agent systems · 12% Motion planning and robot control · 12%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › model-based reinforcement learning › world model
learned dynamics models
1.422024
COPlanner: Plan to Roll Out Conservatively but to Explore Optimistically for Model-Based RL · ICLR 2024
Live in the Moment: Learning Dynamics Model Adapted to Evolving Policy · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
1.422024
COPlanner: Plan to Roll Out Conservatively but to Explore Optimistically for Model-Based RL · ICLR 2024
Live in the Moment: Learning Dynamics Model Adapted to Evolving Policy · ICML 2023
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
exploration
0.812024
COPlanner: Plan to Roll Out Conservatively but to Explore Optimistically for Model-Based RL · ICLR 2024
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
0.812024
COPlanner: Plan to Roll Out Conservatively but to Explore Optimistically for Model-Based RL · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
optimistic exploration
0.812024
COPlanner: Plan to Roll Out Conservatively but to Explore Optimistically for Model-Based RL · ICLR 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
strategic interaction
0.812024
More Victories, Less Cooperation: Assessing Cicero's Diplomacy Play · ACL (1) 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation
0.212024
More Victories, Less Cooperation: Assessing Cicero's Diplomacy Play · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy learning
0.212024
COPlanner: Plan to Roll Out Conservatively but to Explore Optimistically for Model-Based RL · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.212023
Live in the Moment: Learning Dynamics Model Adapted to Evolving Policy · ICML 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

uncertainty-aware model predictive control · 0.8statistical analysis · 0.8optimistic exploration · 0.8game simulation · 0.8conservative rollout · 0.8policy-adapted dynamics model learning · 0.7distribution shift adaptation · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 More Victories, Less Cooperation: Assessing Cicero's Diplomacy Play
abstract
Wichayaporn Wongkamjan, Feng Gu, Yanze Wang, Ulf Hermjakob, Jonathan May, Brandon M. Stewart, Jonathan K. Kummerfeld, Denis Peskoff, Jordan Lee Boyd-Graber. Proceedings of the 62nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2024.
Wichayaporn Wongkamjan, Ulf Hermjakob, Jonathan May, Brandon M. Stewart, Jonathan K. Kummerfeld, Denis Peskoff, Jordan L. Boyd-Graber
ACL (1)1
2024 COPlanner: Plan to Roll Out Conservatively but to Explore Optimistically for Model-Based RL
abstract
Dyna-style model-based reinforcement learning contains two phases: model rollouts to generate sample for policy learning and real environment exploration using current policy for dynamics model learning. However, due to the complex real-world environment, it is inevitable to learn an imperfect dynamics model with model prediction error, which can further mislead policy learning and result in sub-optimal solutions. In this paper, we propose $\texttt{COPlanner}$, a planning-driven framework for model-based methods to address the inaccurately learned dynamics model problem with conservative model rollouts and optimistic environment exploration. $\texttt{COPlanner}$ leverages an uncertainty-aware policy-guided model predictive control (UP-MPC) component to plan for multi-step uncertainty estimation. This estimated uncertainty then serves as a penalty during model rollouts and as a bonus during real environment exploration respectively, to choose actions. Consequently, $\texttt{COPlanner}$ can avoid model uncertain regions through conservative model rollouts, thereby alleviating the influence of model error. Simultaneously, it explores high-reward model uncertain regions to reduce model error actively through optimistic real environment exploration. $\texttt{COPlanner}$ is a plug-and-play framework that can be applied to any dyna-style model-based methods. Experimental results on a series of proprioceptive and visual continuous control tasks demonstrate that both sample efficiency and asymptotic performance of strong model-based methods are significantly improved combined with $\texttt{COPlanner}$.
Ruijie Zheng, Yanchao Sun, Ruonan Jia, Wichayaporn Wongkamjan, Huazhe Xu, Furong Huang
ICLR5
2023 Live in the Moment: Learning Dynamics Model Adapted to Evolving Policy
abstract
Model-based reinforcement learning (RL) often achieves higher sample efficiency in practice than model-free RL by learning a dynamics model to generate samples for policy learning. Previous works learn a dynamics model that fits under the empirical state-action visitation distribution for all historical policies, i.e., the sample replay buffer. However, in this paper, we observe that fitting the dynamics model under the distribution for all historical policies does not necessarily benefit model prediction for the current policy since the policy in use is constantly evolving over time. The evolving policy during training will cause state-action visitation distribution shifts. We theoretically analyze how this distribution shift over historical policies affects the model learning and model rollouts. We then propose a novel dynamics model learning method, named Policy-adapted Dynamics Model Learning (PDML). PDML dynamically adjusts the historical policy mixture distribution to ensure the learned model can continually adapt to the state-action visitation distribution of the evolving policy. Experiments on a range of continuous control environments in MuJoCo show that PDML achieves significant improvement in sample efficiency and higher asymptotic performance combined with the state-of-the-art model-based RL methods.
Wichayaporn Wongkamjan, Ruonan Jia, Furong Huang
ICML2