Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Qiliang Liang

dblp:325/4977 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
8ranked-venue papers
1as first author
8since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0006-9648-8275ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 1 first-author · 7 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Knowledge representation and reasoning · 38% Information extraction and text analysis · 27% Reinforcement learning · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › textual entailment
lexical entailment
1.012026
Enhancing Lexical Relation Mining with Structured Sememe Knowledge · ACL (1) 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation › semantic relations
lexical relation classification
1.012026
Enhancing Lexical Relation Mining with Structured Sememe Knowledge · ACL (1) 2026
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation › semantic relations
lexical relation mining
1.012026
Enhancing Lexical Relation Mining with Structured Sememe Knowledge · ACL (1) 2026
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
1.012026
From Imitation to Discrimination: Toward a Generalized Curriculum Advantage Mechanism Enhancing Cross-Domain Reasoning Tasks · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
post-training
1.012026
From Imitation to Discrimination: Toward a Generalized Curriculum Advantage Mechanism Enhancing Cross-Domain Reasoning Tasks · AAAI 2026
Knowledge graphs
link prediction
0.912025
How Sememic Components Can Benefit Link Prediction for Lexico-Semantic Knowledge Graphs? · EMNLP 2025
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
word sense disambiguation
0.812024
Disambiguate Words like Composing Them: A Morphology-Informed Approach to Enhance Chinese Word Sense Disambiguation · ACL (1) 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback
0.312026
From Imitation to Discrimination: Toward a Generalized Curriculum Advantage Mechanism Enhancing Cross-Domain Reasoning Tasks · AAAI 2026

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sememe tree construction · 1.0pre-trained language model · 1.0curriculum advantage policy optimization · 1.0RLOO · 1.0PPO · 1.0GRPO · 1.0sememe prediction · 0.9sememe knowledge · 0.8morphology-informed modeling · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 From Imitation to Discrimination: Toward a Generalized Curriculum Advantage Mechanism Enhancing Cross-Domain Reasoning Tasks
abstract
Reinforcement learning has emerged as a paradigm for post-training large language models, boosting their reasoning capabilities. Such approaches compute an advantage value for each sample, reflecting better or worse performance than expected, thereby yielding both positive and negative signals for training. However, existing approaches often mix them indiscriminately, especially in the early stages, leading to ambiguous guidance and limited gains. To address this issue, we propose CAPO (Curriculum Advantage Policy Optimization), an adaptive curriculum mechanism based on advantage signals. The proposed mechanism bootstraps imitation learning with positive-only advantage samples to establish robust foundations, and subsequently introduces negative signals to cultivate discriminative capabilities, thereby improving generalization across complex scenarios. Compatible with diverse optimization methods including GRPO, PPO, RLOO, and Reinforce++, our method consistently achieves stable and significant improvements in mathematical reasoning tasks, and further generalizes effectively to multimodal Graphical User Interface (GUI) reasoning scenarios, establishing itself as a versatile and robust optimization paradigm.
Changpeng Yang, Qiliang Liang, Hongzhen Wang, Runyu Shi, Guoquan Zhang
AAAI6
2026 Enhancing Lexical Relation Mining with Structured Sememe Knowledge
abstract
Lexical Relation Mining (LRM) aims to identify and classify lexical relations between word pairs.In this paper, we focus on two subtypes of LRM: Lexical Relation Classification (LRC) and Lexical Entailment (LE).Existing top-performing methods for them rely heavily on Pre-trained Language Models (PLMs) yet fail to distinguish nuanced lexical relations.From a linguistic perspective, intralexical treestructured sememe information can reflect interlexical relations.Inspired by this, we are motivated to explore leveraging such structured knowledge to enhance LRC and LE.We first propose an automated Sememe Tree Construction (STC) pipeline to predict sememe trees; Then, we present the SememeLRM method to fully leverage structured sememe knowledge; Experimental results show that it achieves a notable 1.6% improvement on average across benchmarks, even outperforming Large Language Model (LLM)-based methods that contain 20 times more parameters on most benchmarks.Further results also suggest that sememe trees predicted by our pipeline can rival the gold-standard in HowNet, extending their applicability to lexico-semantic computing.Overall, this paper presents a potentially generalizable framework for leveraging complete sememe trees and makes significant progress, helping to unlock the value of such intralexical knowledge in downstream tasks 1 .
Hansi Wang, Qiliang Liang, Yang Liu 0124
ACL (1)2
2025 LTRS: Improving Word Sense Disambiguation via Learning to Rank Senses
abstract
Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) is a fundamental task critical for accurate semantic understanding. Conventional training strategies usually only consider predefined senses for target words and learn each of them from relatively limited instances, neglecting the influence of similar ones. To address these problems, we propose the method of Learning to Rank Senses (LTRS) to enhance the task. This method helps a model learn to represent and disambiguate senses from a broadened range of instances via ranking an expanded list of sense definitions. By employing LTRS, our model achieves a SOTA F1 score of 79.6% in Chinese WSD and exhibits robustness in low-resource settings. Moreover, it shows excellent training efficiency, achieving faster convergence than previous methods. This provides a new technical approach to WSD and may also apply to the task for other languages.
Hansi Wang, Qiliang Liang
COLING3
2025 How Sememic Components Can Benefit Link Prediction for Lexico-Semantic Knowledge Graphs?
abstract
Link Prediction (LP) aims to predict missing triple information within a Knowledge Graph (KG).Existing LP methods have sought to improve the performance by integrating structural and textual information.However, for lexico-semantic KGs designed to document fine-grained sense distinctions, these types of information may not be sufficient to support effective LP.From a linguistic perspective, word senses within lexico-semantic relations usually show systematic differences in their sememic components.In light of this, we are motivated to enhance LP with sememe knowledge.We first construct a Sememe Prediction (SP) dataset, SememeDef, for learning such knowledge, and two Chinese datasets, HN7 and CWN5, for LP evaluation; Then, we propose a method, SememeLP, to leverage this knowledge for LP fully.It consistently and significantly improves the LP performance in both English and Chinese, achieving SOTA MRR of 75.1%, 80.5%, and 77.1% on WN18RR, HN7, and CWN5, respectively; Finally, an in-depth analysis is conducted, making clear how sememic components can benefit LP for lexico-semantic KGs, which provides promising progress for the completion of them 1 .
Hansi Wang, Qiliang Liang, Yang Liu 0124
EMNLP3
2024 Disambiguate Words like Composing Them: A Morphology-Informed Approach to Enhance Chinese Word Sense Disambiguation
abstract
In parataxis languages like Chinese, word meanings are highly correlated with morphological knowledge, which can help to disambiguate word senses.However, in-depth exploration of morphological knowledge in previous word sense disambiguation (WSD) methods is still lacking due to the absence of publicly available resources.In this paper, we are motivated to enhance Chinese WSD with full morphological knowledge, including both word-formations and morphemes.We first construct the largest releasable Chinese WSD resources, including the lexico-semantic inventories MorInv and WrdInv, a Chinese WSD dataset MiCLS, and an out-of-volcabulary (OOV) test set.Then, we propose a model, MorBERT, to fully leverage this morphology-informed knowledge for Chinese WSD and achieve a SOTA F1 of 92.18% on MiCLS dataset.Finally, we demonstrated the model's robustness in low-resource settings and generalizability to OOV senses.These resources and methods may bring new insights into and solutions for various downstream tasks in both computational and humanistic fields 1 .
Qiliang Liang, Yaqi Yin, Hansi Wang, Yang Liu 0124
ACL (1)2
2024 Morpheme Sense Disambiguation: A New Task Aiming for Understanding the Language at Character Level
abstract
Morphemes serve as a strong linguistic feature to capture lexical semantics, with higher coverage than words and more natural than sememes. However, due to the lack of morpheme-informed resources and the expense of manual annotation, morpheme-enhanced methods remain largely unexplored in Computational Linguistics. To address this issue, we propose the task of Morpheme Sense Disambiguation (MSD), with two subtasks in-text and in-word, similar to Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) and Sememe Prediction (SP), to generalize morpheme features on more tasks. We first build the MorDis resource for Chinese, including MorInv as a morpheme inventory, MorTxt and MorWrd as two types of morpheme-annotated datasets. Next, we provide two baselines in each evaluation; the best model yields a promising precision of 77.66% on in-text MSD and 88.19% on in-word MSD, indicating its comparability with WSD and superiority over SP. Finally, we demonstrate that predicted morphemes achieve comparable performance with the ground-truth ones on a downstream application of Definition Generation (DG). This validates the feasibility and applicability of our proposed tasks. The resources and workflow of MSD will provide new insights and solutions for downstream tasks, including DG as well as WSD, training pre-trained models, etc.
Yaqi Yin, Hansi Wang, Qiliang Liang
LREC/COLING5
2024 Discriminative boundary generation for effective outlier detection
Ji Zhang 0001, Qiliang Liang, Mohamed Jaward Bah, Hongzhou Li, Liang Chang 0003, R. Uday Kiran
Knowl. Inf. Syst.2
2022 Effective and Robust Boundary-Based Outlier Detection Using Generative Adversarial Networks
Qiliang Liang, Ji Zhang 0001, Mohamed Jaward Bah, Hongzhou Li, Liang Chang 0003, R. Uday Kiran
DEXA (2)1